<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We need health care reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/5260/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5260</link>
	<description>Internal medicine, American health care, and especially medical education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kirsch, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5260/comment-page-1#comment-531467</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kirsch, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=5260#comment-531467</guid>
		<description>I am not certain that the Democratic plan is really better than the status quo.&#160; I think their plan made significant inroads on expanding access, but failed in controlling costs.&#160; To accomplish the latter, various stakeholders would have to sacrifice income, careers and companies.&#160; Not surprisingly, there weren&#039;t&#160; too many volunteers.&#160; Hospitals and Pharma agreed at the outset to give back, but most of the players in the game zealously protected their parochial interests.&#160; My view is that medical overutilization should be attacked.&#160; Of source,&#160; an &#039;overutilized&#039; test or treatment is someone else&#039;s income.&#160; No easy solution here.&#160; Get prepared for microreform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not certain that the Democratic plan is really better than the status quo.&nbsp; I think their plan made significant inroads on expanding access, but failed in controlling costs.&nbsp; To accomplish the latter, various stakeholders would have to sacrifice income, careers and companies.&nbsp; Not surprisingly, there weren&#39;t&nbsp; too many volunteers.&nbsp; Hospitals and Pharma agreed at the outset to give back, but most of the players in the game zealously protected their parochial interests.&nbsp; My view is that medical overutilization should be attacked.&nbsp; Of source,&nbsp; an &#39;overutilized&#39; test or treatment is someone else&#39;s income.&nbsp; No easy solution here.&nbsp; Get prepared for microreform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Bob (FP)</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5260/comment-page-1#comment-531465</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Bob (FP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=5260#comment-531465</guid>
		<description>None of the national level politicians (both D &amp; R) have the courage to suggest things that result in real cost control.&#160; They can&#039;t do this without angering some group that contributes money.&#160; They can&#039;t cut costs without affecting some group&#039;s gravy train (Pharma, insurers, physicians, etc.)&#160; They don&#039;t think they can win votes if they tell people what they really need to hear (yes, the public is guilty of over-utilization too).&#160; I too am becoming cynical that any meaningful reform will happen on the national level.&#160; I think we&#039;ll have to tackle this on the state level.&#160; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of the national level politicians (both D &amp; R) have the courage to suggest things that result in real cost control.&nbsp; They can&#39;t do this without angering some group that contributes money.&nbsp; They can&#39;t cut costs without affecting some group&#39;s gravy train (Pharma, insurers, physicians, etc.)&nbsp; They don&#39;t think they can win votes if they tell people what they really need to hear (yes, the public is guilty of over-utilization too).&nbsp; I too am becoming cynical that any meaningful reform will happen on the national level.&nbsp; I think we&#39;ll have to tackle this on the state level.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB&#39;s Medical Rants » Blog Archive » We need health care reform &#171; Master Blog For USA</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5260/comment-page-1#comment-531463</link>
		<dc:creator>DB&#39;s Medical Rants » Blog Archive » We need health care reform &#171; Master Blog For USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=5260#comment-531463</guid>
		<description>[...] Read this article: DB&#039;s Medical Rants » Blog Archive » We need health care reform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read this article: DB&#39;s Medical Rants » Blog Archive » We need health care reform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB&#39;s Medical Rants » Blog Archive » We need health care reform &#124; Health Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5260/comment-page-1#comment-531449</link>
		<dc:creator>DB&#39;s Medical Rants » Blog Archive » We need health care reform &#124; Health Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=5260#comment-531449</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue reading here: DB&#039;s Medical Rants » Blog Archive » We need health care reform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue reading here: DB&#39;s Medical Rants » Blog Archive » We need health care reform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterW</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5260/comment-page-1#comment-531435</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=5260#comment-531435</guid>
		<description>I should add that of course expanding insurance only exacerbates the third party payer problem that leads to escalating costs. &#160;Europe and Japan started from a lower base but now have the same rate of cost inflation as us, thanks to the perverse incentives - if my boss is paying, I&#039;ll have filet mignon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that of course expanding insurance only exacerbates the third party payer problem that leads to escalating costs. &nbsp;Europe and Japan started from a lower base but now have the same rate of cost inflation as us, thanks to the perverse incentives &#8211; if my boss is paying, I&#39;ll have filet mignon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterW</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5260/comment-page-1#comment-531434</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=5260#comment-531434</guid>
		<description>Of course the Democrats focused entirely on expanding insurance, without doing a thing about the main issue: cost control. &#160;Everyone can agree that &quot;reform&quot; is needed, but many many policies fall into that box and many of them are harmful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the Democrats focused entirely on expanding insurance, without doing a thing about the main issue: cost control. &nbsp;Everyone can agree that &quot;reform&quot; is needed, but many many policies fall into that box and many of them are harmful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

