Comparative effectiveness research – more thoughts

1 Feb
2010

Nice to see that I create a bit of controversy.  Perhaps I have read the blogs incorrectly, but my reading had suggested a bias against comparative effectiveness research.  The comments I receive state no concern with research but rather how the government will use the research.

The government and the insurance industry can always pervert data.  I contend that excellent data will help us avoid bad performance measures.  Excellent CER will give us the ammunition to describe the problem of many performance measures.

Readers know of my concern about performance measurement for the purposes of incentives.  I am interested in knowing how we do on performance measures so that we can learn, but I do not want those results reported as if they actually measure care quality.

So I am strongly on the side of expanded CER while opposing incentives to drive performance.  The data do not support the use of incentives, and they even suggest that incentives could have markedly negative externalities. 

I want CER so that i can use the data and practice better medicine.

Related posts:

  1. Comparative effectiveness research
  2. A specious argument against CER
  3. Organizations in favor of CER
  4. My hopes for CER
  5. We need comparative effectiveness and cost effectiveness

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Comment Form