<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: P4P must fail because it uses a left brain solution to a whole brain problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/5093/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5093</link>
	<description>Internal medicine, American health care, and especially medical education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcb</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5093/comment-page-1#comment-530766</link>
		<dc:creator>pcb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=5093#comment-530766</guid>
		<description>Polypharmacy is one of the huge negative consequences of P4P schemes.&#160; I know some excellent physicians who feel one of their main purposes in medicine is to pare down the med lists of patients they care for.&#160;
Do bad there&#039;s not a quality measure for prioritizing a patient&#039;s med list to best suit the needs of the patient rather than their individual diseases.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polypharmacy is one of the huge negative consequences of P4P schemes.&nbsp; I know some excellent physicians who feel one of their main purposes in medicine is to pare down the med lists of patients they care for.&nbsp;<br />
Do bad there&#39;s not a quality measure for prioritizing a patient&#39;s med list to best suit the needs of the patient rather than their individual diseases.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solo dr</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/5093/comment-page-1#comment-530763</link>
		<dc:creator>solo dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=5093#comment-530763</guid>
		<description>P4P is similar to some of the capitated Medicare HMOS in my area. I elected not to join the HMOs, as each group or physician is paid based on efficiency and quality. Bonuses can reach 6 digits at the end of the year, as long as you do not have sick patients. Monthly payments based on efficiency and number of patients are paid to each physician. Office visits are discouraged, as grater than 3 visits/patient means the doctor loses money. Inpatient care is not covered by capitation, so inpatient stays are extremely short. What happens is the groups with the sickest patients &quot;depanel&quot; them to the new docs, so that the groups can maintain their bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P4P is similar to some of the capitated Medicare HMOS in my area. I elected not to join the HMOs, as each group or physician is paid based on efficiency and quality. Bonuses can reach 6 digits at the end of the year, as long as you do not have sick patients. Monthly payments based on efficiency and number of patients are paid to each physician. Office visits are discouraged, as grater than 3 visits/patient means the doctor loses money. Inpatient care is not covered by capitation, so inpatient stays are extremely short. What happens is the groups with the sickest patients &quot;depanel&quot; them to the new docs, so that the groups can maintain their bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

