I just finished reading A Whole New Mind by Dan Pink. The book has its strengths and weaknesses, but it does make some very good points about right brain function.
Medicine is not a left brain function solely. If we just see trees then we miss the patient in the forest. Too often I see patients on too many meds, with medication side effects, because a physician (or 2 or 3 or more) was treating a problem rather than the patient.
Too often the patient is given the correct prescription, but the physician does not explain the medication appropriately. Too often the patient cannot afford the medication, but the physician does not even ask.
Patients need our empathy in addition to our checkbox medicine. We have bean counters, only examining the left brain function of patient care. But patients are not widgets. Every day I interact with patients, and try to understand how best to improve there quality of life. I try to provide high quality care, but that does not always fit onto a checklist. Many important things that we do are not included in checklists.
P4P is (as I said earlier) immoral and I believe unethical. It is not scientifically sound, because it has not passed any scientific testing!
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
2 Responses to P4P must fail because it uses a left brain solution to a whole brain problem
solo dr
December 12th, 2009 at 6:57 pm
P4P is similar to some of the capitated Medicare HMOS in my area. I elected not to join the HMOs, as each group or physician is paid based on efficiency and quality. Bonuses can reach 6 digits at the end of the year, as long as you do not have sick patients. Monthly payments based on efficiency and number of patients are paid to each physician. Office visits are discouraged, as grater than 3 visits/patient means the doctor loses money. Inpatient care is not covered by capitation, so inpatient stays are extremely short. What happens is the groups with the sickest patients "depanel" them to the new docs, so that the groups can maintain their bonuses.
pcb
December 13th, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Polypharmacy is one of the huge negative consequences of P4P schemes. I know some excellent physicians who feel one of their main purposes in medicine is to pare down the med lists of patients they care for.
Do bad there's not a quality measure for prioritizing a patient's med list to best suit the needs of the patient rather than their individual diseases.