Will primary care residency slots make a difference

9 Dec
2009

KevinMD thinks not – Adding more residency slots won’t improve primary care numbers

He makes an important point – unless we fix the "job" we will not have more primary care physicians. 

His misses the other point.  If we fix the job, then we do need to increase the pipeline.

He also misses that some of these slots will go to family medicine.

I still believe increasing residency slots for primary care is important.  I also believe we need a major reconstruction of the job.

Related posts:

  1. The doctor shortage (hat tip to @FutureDocs and @efalchuk)
  2. Thoughts on lobbying for HR 2350
  3. Dazed and Confused – Levels of primary care?
  4. Catch-22 – what the NY Times op-ed missed
  5. Primary care – money is the answer

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

4 Responses to Will primary care residency slots make a difference

Avatar

#1 Dinosaur

December 9th, 2009 at 8:25 am

Spot on.

Avatar

Jared

December 9th, 2009 at 8:32 pm

We do have a deeper pipeline than is often discussed.  There is a large influx of foreign medical graduates that are waiting in the wings for any residency slot.

Avatar

solo dr

December 9th, 2009 at 9:51 pm

Only arount 60-70% of the FM slots are filled by US grads each year.  Increasing the slots won't get more US grads into the slots.  In the Midwest, FM, IM, and Ortho are the top three recruited ares with the current shortages.  $160,000-$180,000 starting salaries are not unheard of in my area for new grads in FM.

Avatar

Dr. Bob (FP)

December 10th, 2009 at 10:19 pm

The pipeline may already be improving.  Applications to our program are up 50% this year & several of the other programs are having similar increases.  I think all this talk of the need for primary care in the healthcare debate is gettting through to medical students.  Hopefully the job fix will happen so they'll be happy with their choice.

Comment Form