An interview about hospitalists

28 Nov
2009

Do hospitalists really provide better care?

In which I challenge hospitalists to perform important new studies concerning the best models for hospitalist groups.  I hope those who read this interview understand that I am supportive of hospitalist programs.  What I hope careful reading shows is that we need research to help improve those programs even more.

If hospitalists really want to prove their worth, Dr. Centor says, studies need to look at how to put together a good hospitalist group, what type of “group sociology” might cause newly-hired residents to leave after only a year or two, and what type of hospitalist leadership makes a difference in care quality.

“A really strong hospitalist group,” Dr. Centor points out, “infiltrates the entire hospital culture and works with the entire hospital—the nursing staff, the physical therapists, everyone—to try to figure out how it can make lengths of stay shorter and more efficient, with fewer errors.”

I know of great hospitalist programs and weak hospitalist programs.  We need better definitions of hospitalist program excellence.

To make myself very clear – I support the hospitalist movement, but I want all hospitals and programs to strive towards making their programs highest quality.  Patients deserve no less.

Related posts:

  1. What makes a good hospitalist program?
  2. The quality portfolio
  3. Some hospitalist jobs are better than others
  4. The Academic Hospitalist Academy
  5. Thoughts on the Academic Hospitalist Academy

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Comment Form