Performance measure overdose

24 Jul
2009

Tight Glucose Control Raises Mortality Risk in Heart Failure

Now we have even more data that the HgbA1c goal of < 7 may have adverse effects. The very tight control mafia will argue that this is a heart disease specific problem. I say "balderdash."

Almost every drug and treatment has benefits are risks. As we saw with erythropoeitin too much of a "good thing" can actually be detrimental.

I suspect that the problem here relies in the number of medications needed to lower the HgbA1c below 7. As the number of medications increases, so do the adverse reactions. Perhaps the problem is hypoglycemia, masked by the beta blockers used for heart failure.

I continue to caution that performance measures are interventions, and thus should be evaluated as such. Off the top of my head I can cite the 4 hour rule, HgbA1c < 7 and Hgb >13 (for CKD) as examples of failed performance measures.

We have too many “experts” who want to use short cuts to assess quality. They forget H.L. Mencken’s admonition – For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. Quality is complex, and really cannot be assessed using scorecards or league tables.

As I have quoted many times before, the noted British philosopher Onora O’neill wrote in 2002:

Yet faith in performance indicators is hard to dislodge. Every time one performance indicator is shown to be inaccurate, shown to encourage perverse behaviour, or shown to mislead the public, eager people imagine that they will find other performance indicators free of such adverse effects. Experience suggests that they are as mistaken as those who produced the last lot of indicators.

How right she is!

Related posts:

  1. Performance indicators need testing
  2. My position on performance measures
  3. Another performance measure challenged – BP goal
  4. Time to reconsider the HgbA1c targets
  5. Measurement – the good and bad

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

3 Responses to Performance measure overdose

Avatar

Mary Andrawis

July 24th, 2009 at 8:55 am

Thanks for a thought-provoking post! I think it comes down to the use of strong, evidence-based clinical guidelines in the development of these quality metrics. Quality IS complex, but if we could just find a better way to PRACTICE what the guidelines deem as good care, I think care can, and will, improve.

Avatar

curious

July 24th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

Tell us, please: since Onora O’Neill is such an unquestionable source of Truth, what solution does she suggest? Implicit quality review? Kudos, if that’s the case! (if only we could realign payment rules to support implicit review activities)

I doubt she supports a state of blissful ignorance or believes there are no deficiencies in the quality of care delivered to patients.

Avatar

lilane

August 15th, 2009 at 1:31 am

Apparel|Ed Hardy Men Clothing|Ed Hardy Men T-Shirts|Ed Hardy Women T-Shirts|Footwear|Jerseys|Sunglasses|Tiffany Jewelry http://www.80trade.com

Nike Air Max|Jordan Shoes|Puma Shoes|Prada Shoes|Supra Shoes http://www.vmytrade.com

Comment Form