<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coding is impossible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/463/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/463</link>
	<description>Internal medicine, American health care, and especially medical education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Covert Rationing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Way to Run Afoul of E&#38;M Coding</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/463/comment-page-1#comment-513837</link>
		<dc:creator>The Covert Rationing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Way to Run Afoul of E&#38;M Coding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 03:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2002/09/09/coding-is-impossible/#comment-513837</guid>
		<description>[...] DrRich does not mean to offend his medical colleagues by claiming they can&#8217;t code correctly. He is just stating a fact. There is, in fact, no &#8220;correct&#8221; way to code, because correct coding is impossible. This verity was proven a few years ago when a group of specialized government-sanctioned coders took a sample of typical doctor-patient visits, coded them according to their own E&amp;M guidelines - and they all got different answers. DB describes this interesting result in an old post, here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DrRich does not mean to offend his medical colleagues by claiming they can&#8217;t code correctly. He is just stating a fact. There is, in fact, no &#8220;correct&#8221; way to code, because correct coding is impossible. This verity was proven a few years ago when a group of specialized government-sanctioned coders took a sample of typical doctor-patient visits, coded them according to their own E&amp;M guidelines &#8211; and they all got different answers. DB describes this interesting result in an old post, here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

