Why the 4th year is worthwhile

26 Jun
2009

Med School ‘Senioritis’ as suggested by FutureDoc in a tweet.

While Lyss-Lerman does not advocate getting rid of the fourth year, she said that it needs to be revised to be more useful. The study suggests a curriculum wherein students “have more authentic roles in patient care,” which, she said, will help them to develop their own identities as physicians and collaboratively practice the humanistic elements of medicine. Specific recommendations for fourth year curriculum additions include sub-internships in internal medicine, and rotations for critical care, ambulatory care, and emergency medicine. The idea is to make sure students are achieving competencies — a movement in medicine to assess students based on critical skills rather than memorized facts — even as they enter the home stretch of their education. The study suggestions were based on interviews with 30 residency program directors at San Francisco.

Having graduated in the 70s, I have heard the argument for 35 years. My medical school had a 3 year option while I was a student. Most students felt that the 3 year grads had missed important opportunities.

Now I have worked at 2 medical schools that have some 4th year requirements. All our students have to take a medicine AI. Invariably the students find this a very valuable experience. They have to take 2 other AIs during the year.

What does the 4th year provide? I believe that the competency movement has a flaw. It cannot measure wisdom and comfort. Being a physician is more than knowledge and more than skills. Being a physician requires wisdom.

Wisdom only comes through experience. Those who teach residents know that residents continue to grow throughout residency. They often can do well enough on the test as interns to pass the boards, but they still pale compared to senior residents when approaching patient care.

I believe the 4th year is a consolidation year. I agree with the need for required acting internships. I advise students to take some electives related to their field of interest and some complimentary electives.

Yes tuition is too high, but that should not become a reason to short change education. Students benefit from the 4th year. The 3 year experiments in the 70s were not great successes.

Related posts:

  1. In which at least 2 commenters miss my point
  2. Does IM training lead to decrease primary care selection?
  3. Graduate medical education and the Long Tail
  4. Is medicine worth it?
  5. Do we need a new Flexner report?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

1 Response to Why the 4th year is worthwhile

Avatar

Web Media Daily – Friday June 26, 2009 | Reinventing Yourself...

June 26th, 2009 at 7:43 am

[...] Why the 4th year is worthwhile [...]

Comment Form