What is wrong with health care

8 Jun
2009

 

As we go through the debates over health care reform, one strawman argument will involve free market thinking.  I favor free market thinking, but to invoke free markets as a defense of our current health care system is wrong.  CMS has such influence over health care that we do not have free markets.  I cannot collect what the market will bear, rather I receive what the insurers (following CMS) will pay.

CMS (and the RUC) have put us into a position that leads to increased costs and decreased access.  The problem is one of bureacratic decision making and reliance on the AMA’s RUC. 

We have the worst of all worlds.  We have price controls with the controls determine in a closed process in which politics make a difference.

The free market works – look at the price of Lasik surgery.  The free market works – look at the success of retainer medicine.

I wish we had a real free market – I would love patients to really become involved in decision making.  I doubt that we will have a real free market, but at least can we ask for a transparent bureaucracy?

Related posts:

  1. In which Evan Falchuk explores health care reform
  2. Free market theory does not apply to medicine
  3. More on Universal Health Care
  4. Are the Democrats destroying health care reform?
  5. A different primary care model 2

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

9 Responses to What is wrong with health care

Avatar

Happy Hospitalist

June 8th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

One example of where free markets would work. A rural surgeon (or PCP) with no other surgeon (or PCP) within 500 miles should be able to charge, and collect 5X what a surgeon in a beach town with 500 surgeons available should be able to collect.

That both collect the same (or close to the same) is reason enough why you can’t find a PCP or a surgeon in small town USA.

Avatar

WarmSocks

June 8th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

Happy – They don’t collect the same $ for the same services. My uncle was a cardiologist in a small town. He was paid half what cardiologists 15 miles away in the big city were paid. He asked around. Other docs started talking to their associates in the city to learn what they were being paid; the result was that all doctors in the small town moved their practices to the city. By driving 15 miles, they doubled their incomes.

Avatar

Oskie94

June 8th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

Some states pay rural doctors more or give them tax credits.

Avatar

small town dr

June 8th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

The insurance companies will pay 10 doctors in the same town 10 different fee schedules. Fees may be off by up to $10 a code eitehr way for office visits. The insurance companies have a take it or leave it attituted when dealing with solo doctors or small groups of 2-3 physicians.

Avatar

solo dr

June 8th, 2009 at 8:54 pm

I got a bonus once for seeing a patient who had a rural address, if though my zip code does not qualify normally for it. It was a special housecall. My bonuse was than a $1 extra for the Medicare housecall about an hour from my office.

Avatar

Tree93

June 8th, 2009 at 11:34 pm

“The free market works – look at the success of retainer medicine.”

That’s like saying the auto industry is in fine shape because people are still buying Lexuses.

Avatar

Health » What is wrong with health care | DB's Medical Rants

June 9th, 2009 at 4:46 am

[...] Read the original: What is wrong with health care | DB's Medical Rants [...]

Avatar

ErnieG

June 9th, 2009 at 10:55 am

I think one large problem with advocating retainer medicine is that it is only good for primary care where there are few procedures. It does not at all provide an alternative to any type of health care where specialist are involved, procedures are necessary, or care gets complicated; it can only provide a supplement to insurance.

It does not follow that a free market will lead to more decision making by patients or an improvement in care. Free markets work well when buyers and sellers of products and goods compete freely for services/products in a transparent market where knowledge is open to both buyers and sellers at a place where transacations are once and done deals, and where the products/services are produced by the seller and consumed by the buyer. In medicine, patients don’t know what they want or need (that’s why they need doctors), care can be ongoing, and costs can escalte quickly even when pursuing the most conservative treatment strategies. Free markets in medicine work with patients who have expendable money and in areas that are “lifestyle” procedures (i.e. Lasik, cosmetics). Insurance works in part because it spreads financial risk; the question for medicine in the US is how to contain costs (if it did not cost so much, the political will to change medicine would not exist. Most other discussions, including the compensation of physicians, overal public health, would not have enough political force.) Politics will always make a difference in medicine– no other large first world country has delivery of medical care outside of government control, either directly via single payer or indirectly via tight regulation and control of insurance markets.

Avatar

brian

June 17th, 2009 at 8:53 pm

the basic problem:
doctors and hospitals have a socialized income and free market expenses.

it’s the worst of both worlds. I dont care which way we go…. we just have to get off the fence. socialize my income and expenses….. or keep free market expenses but let us charge what the market will bear…. not what some random fee schedule that the government pulls out of the air.

Comment Form