<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And this is the point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/4329/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/4329</link>
	<description>Internal medicine, American health care, and especially medical education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: solo dr</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/4329/comment-page-1#comment-527715</link>
		<dc:creator>solo dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=4329#comment-527715</guid>
		<description>One of my naturalized US citizens, who originally grew up in England, was surprised when she saw me on weekend rounds.  In England, physicians do not have to see their patients on weekends, outside of emergencies, and most of the care can be done by phone.

I could treat at least 30% of my daily office visits by phone, but I would not get paid and would still be liable for the care.  Often doing the physical on a routine patient for allergies or a sinus infection feels wasteful, including having to make sure the bullet points are done to get paid by the insurance company.  Most of the EHR systems have a generic, and often not asked, Review of Systems.  Much of the time the hospital and office notes are either to cover liability or to get paid through the archaic billing methods.  
I have seen charts from 20-30 years ago.  A patient with a sore throat would have a short note on a 4x6 card or ongoing sheet of paper in the chart, such as strept pharygitis, penicilling given.  Nowadays you have to write a 20-30 line note to cover the SOAP format and to survive any insurance company audits.  This increased documentation has not improved the care .  Apparently in the mid 1990s, CMS/Medicare came out with a lot of rules for ROS and H&amp;Ps.  A lot of the work feels robotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my naturalized US citizens, who originally grew up in England, was surprised when she saw me on weekend rounds.  In England, physicians do not have to see their patients on weekends, outside of emergencies, and most of the care can be done by phone.</p>
<p>I could treat at least 30% of my daily office visits by phone, but I would not get paid and would still be liable for the care.  Often doing the physical on a routine patient for allergies or a sinus infection feels wasteful, including having to make sure the bullet points are done to get paid by the insurance company.  Most of the EHR systems have a generic, and often not asked, Review of Systems.  Much of the time the hospital and office notes are either to cover liability or to get paid through the archaic billing methods.<br />
I have seen charts from 20-30 years ago.  A patient with a sore throat would have a short note on a 4&#215;6 card or ongoing sheet of paper in the chart, such as strept pharygitis, penicilling given.  Nowadays you have to write a 20-30 line note to cover the SOAP format and to survive any insurance company audits.  This increased documentation has not improved the care .  Apparently in the mid 1990s, CMS/Medicare came out with a lot of rules for ROS and H&amp;Ps.  A lot of the work feels robotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky Balboa, Jr, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/4329/comment-page-1#comment-527711</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky Balboa, Jr, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/?p=4329#comment-527711</guid>
		<description>~50% of office visits are unnecessary.  We only practice in this archaic fashion so that we can fill out a slip, submit it to a third party and maybe get paid.

The only way for primary care to survive is to refuse payment from a third-party.  Let the patient submit for reimbursement.

Under these &quot;lean&quot; conditions our care is affordable and effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~50% of office visits are unnecessary.  We only practice in this archaic fashion so that we can fill out a slip, submit it to a third party and maybe get paid.</p>
<p>The only way for primary care to survive is to refuse payment from a third-party.  Let the patient submit for reimbursement.</p>
<p>Under these &#8220;lean&#8221; conditions our care is affordable and effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

