Thoughts on lobbying for HR 2350

21 May
2009

 

I spent the day walking around Capital Hill, visiting 6 congressional and 2 senatorial offices.  Lobbying does not come naturally to me, but I have learned that the activity has become an integral part of our democratic process.

ACP made this process painless.  We had a busy day visiting all these offices, but our schedule really was optimal for success.  The announcement of HR 2350 (see yesterday’s press release) really defined our lobbying.  We had a compact message as HR 2350 combines several important aspects of ACP policy.

Our message:

  1. Payment reform for primary care
  2. Loan repayment and scholarship programs
  3. Support for the patient centered medical home
  4. Increased CMS funding for primary care (and general surgery) housestaff positions

We had a chance to talk with 3 congressmen.  You mostly speak with staffers when you lobby, but 2 congressmen spent significant time discussing the bill.

Primary care is dying in this country, and hopes of universal coverage depend on an adequate supply of family physicians, pediatricians and internists.  I blogged about the New York Times coverage of  last month – Finding enough primary care.

I believe that the components of this bill are essential to health care reform.  If we do not work to rescue primary care, then all other health care components will mean little.

 

Related posts:

  1. HR 2350
  2. Some thoughts on health care reform
  3. Some early inclusions in the House bill
  4. Are the Democrats destroying health care reform?
  5. A few more thoughts

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

1 Response to Thoughts on lobbying for HR 2350

Avatar

David Block MD

May 21st, 2009 at 7:13 pm

How does this provide an incentive for primary care practice over the productive life of the practitioner? And how does this provide an incentive for the practice of quality medicine, fulfilling to physician, consumer, and all other stakeholders? Will an FP ever be able to see as many patients as a radiologist can read film?

For the last year for which I could find statistics on a quick trip through Google, about $280 billion was spent just by Medicare for Part B. Let’s not think about private insurers or Medicaid yet. There are around 500,000 practicing physicians in the United States. If we agree that every physician should make “plenty of money” (enough to be secure and, more importantly, feel secure and feel appreciated, etc.), then, again, why not just guarantee every practicing physician that one-half million dollars per year – and no more. Incentivize the practice of medicine, if you will; disincentivize the abuse of the system. It would take no more than Medicare is paying now. Have private insurers subsidize Medicare. No more Medicaid woes. No more billing debacles. Remove doctors from the “business” side of the equation. At least, ask them how they would feel about that.

Pay doctors for BEING doctors, and not for the piecemeal practice of a cottage industry as defined by social, political, and economic systems 100 years ago.

Or else, tell me what’s wrong with this proposal.

Comment Form