I hope Obama listens to Baucus

14 Nov
2008

 

Senator Baucus’ Answer to Who Should Pay for Primary Care?  As usual, Bob Doherty nails the issue.  Baucus completely understands the problem.  These are the highlights:

A process would be created to reduce payments for services found to be overvalued under the Medicare physician fee schedule and redistribute them to increase payments for undervalued primary care services. The paper implies that this review would take place outside the usual RVS Update Committee (RUC) process.

I (and other bloggers) have highlighted the problems of the RUC over that past year.  We will not get fee schedules to appropriately value primary care services without such reform.

The changes in physician payment will be budget neutral, meaning "that any increase to primary care providers requires a corresponding cut to specialist services." The paper acknowledges that such redistribution "has the potential to create significant controversy among physicians."

No kidding. Every effort over the past twenty years to increase payments for primary care has created enormous controversy within medicine.

Bob Doherty finishes with this:

Today’s questions: Do you agree with Senator Baucus that primary care is the "keystone" of a high performing health care system and needs to be supported with higher fees, even if that means taking money from other specialists, including some internists? If you don’t believe specialists’ fees should be cut, then how would you recommend Senator Baucus and his colleagues pay for higher primary care payments–if at all?

I wish that we could fix this problem without having winners and losers, however, the reason that we have this problem is because we have already had winners and losers for 20 years.  For 20 years, internists and family physicians have lost relative to other physicians. 

I have posted with much frustration over the past two weeks.  I understand that money and life style will rule medical student and resident decision making.  We (the country) need more internists and family physicians.  By increasing payment, we will have more internists choose outpatient medicine and more students choose both fields.

 

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen

Related posts:

  1. Dazed and Confused – Levels of primary care?
  2. It’s the job – the only solution to primary care
  3. The barrier – echoing my mantra
  4. Family medicine vs internal medicine
  5. In which I respond to angry comments

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

6 Responses to I hope Obama listens to Baucus

Avatar

SteveSC

November 14th, 2008 at 9:02 am

Divide and conquer.

The RVS was used to buy off proceduralists into accepting centralized price setting. Now, in classic form, the claim is that the ‘disadvantaged’ physicians have to be ‘made whole’.

Budget neutral means no overall increases in physician income, despite increases in the population and increasing utilization as the population ages. Who really believes that primary care docs will get a significant increase? This is just a way to drop the payments to proceduralists.

The next step will be–since there ‘isn’t enough money’ to significantly increase primary care docs–to push more NPs and PAs into independent primary care, since they are ‘cheaper’.

Avatar

Dr Dan

November 14th, 2008 at 1:14 pm

I certainly second SteveSC’s observations about the not-so-stealthy insertion of NPs and PAs to replace primary care docs. I still have not been reassured that the medical home idea embraced by my own academy will end up being anything other than a trojan horse. We will wake up and find that we have a de facto capitation system: our patients will require referrals from us, increasing the hassle factor and producing an adversarial relationship. Our “management” fees will depend on decreased utilization of specialists’ services and testing. If that isn’t capitation, what is it?

Avatar

I hope Obama listens to Baucus | rvnr.com

December 22nd, 2008 at 12:39 pm

[...] I hope Obama listens to Baucus [...]

Avatar

A Round Up of Baucus Plan Commentary - Part 3 « Small Diseases

March 8th, 2009 at 6:11 pm

[...] also no underestimating the physicians’ distrust of the RUC committee. Medrants likes the Baucus plan proposal to move decisions about primary care reimbursement out from the [...]

Avatar

A Round Up of Baucus Plan Commentary - Part 3 | Diario BV

April 2nd, 2009 at 12:07 am

[...] also no underestimating the physicians’ distrust of the RUC committee. Medrants likes the Baucus plan proposal to move decisions about primary care reimbursement out from the [...]

Avatar

Health Care BS - BAUCUS & THE PRIMARY CARE PROBLEM

August 20th, 2009 at 9:58 am

[...] Robert Centor is a case in point. He hopes that Obama will heed the Baucus proposal to “spread the wealth around” (i.e. cut specialist payments in order to increase those of PCPs). I wish that we could fix this problem without having winners and losers, however, the reason that we have this problem is because we have already had winners and losers for 20 years.  [...]

Comment Form