Thanks to all the comments on my previous post. I believe that I did an incomplete job in describing my concerns.
Our current payment system has incentives for the wrong behavior. If all lawyers received $200 for a will (fixed price, regardless of complexity), we would see shoddy, cookie cutter wills and lawyers who avoid complex elderly rich people. You can repeat that sentence for tax accountants.
When you see any professional or craftsman, you pay according to complexity. Complexity includes a breadth of issues. In medicine it certainly should include the number of chronic diseases, the severity of those diseases, the number of medications, whether the patient has had a recent hospitalization, the age, comorbid psychiatric diagnoses and whether or not the patient has one or more new problems.
Medicare (and thus private insurers) pay us for a visit. They provide a modest increase for increased complexity, but then require irrelevant documentation procedures. They do not pay us for non-office followups – telephone calls, emails, or even text messaging. Try that with your lawyer. The lawyer tells you a joke, and you pay for another 6 minutes of their time!
We need a true payment system that allows physicians to more easily bill for their time (they have a clumsy, difficult to document mechanism.)Â We need the ability to increase our rates if the demand for our services is great.
Retainer medicine provides a model which we could modify to develop a more reasonable payment structure. We need to decrease the physician’s overhead. We need to decrease the bureaucracy of payment.
Will better payment make a difference? I assert that better payment is the only driving force which will direct students and residents to “primary care” (readers know that I actually hate using this term because it is so poorly understood.) By primary care, I refer to comprehensiveness, continuity, and accessibility. We need more true primary care physicians. Only when we fix payment can we increase these numbers.
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen


{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
Retainer medicine provides a model which we could modify to develop a more reasonable payment structure. We need to decrease the physician’s overhead. We need to decrease the bureaucracy of payment.
A single-payer system will certainly reduce overhead and bureaucracy. As long as we continue to have a health insurance system where profit is maximized instead of effective care, Dr. Center, we’ll continue to have a system with pre-existing conditions, coverage caps, fighting for medication and treatment approvals, etc. The way insurers make money is by getting rid of sick people, insuring healthy people, and denying care. And all of those things demand bureaucracy.
Dr. CentOr! Typo, sorry!
graham, Medicare is single payer for the elderly. Do you believe a primary care doctor could survive on medicare alone? If you do, you are living in a fantasy world. Medicare payment structures, through their attempts to reign in costs from a payment containment model, instead of a demand model has given us the over doctored, over proceduralized health care we have today.
Having everyone on Medicare will not only increase costs to the system, it will decrease payment to physicians AND as a result, will only exacerbate the issue with volume.
A third party payer by any means, government or private, will result in the same outcome. Higher cost care without a significant benefit in health.
Put the people in control of their health care spending with their own dollars, and you will see the demand curve shift down ward.
Get the physician out of the position of being the insurance companies float, and you will see the cost structure plummet.
There by increasing access to care.
I do not think it follows that a single-payer system automatically means less overhead and bureaucracy. I worked in the VA for 9 years–and there was plenty of both! Moreover, there was no “reward” to any VA provider for doing a good job for patients (however you define it).
Single-payer advocates like to say that the “single payer” needn’t be the government, but some other (third) party. Well, who might that be? And does it matter who it is? If the funding is through taxes, then the government holds the purse-strings (and pushes the levers and controls healthcare delivery).
Our system is crummy because the profit motive is not checked by feedback from consumers–patients don’t have the ability to shop around for doctors, based on readily available outcomes information, and obtain the care they value most and are willing to pay for. Right now, “effective care” is being determined by insurance companies and the government, not a doctor and her patient in a mutual discussion. How would the latter be facilitated with a single-payer system? I just don’t see it.
I can’t tell you how many patients would like me to call them for lots of things, and email them, etc. They want the sort of attention I’d like to provide, but I can’t because of the way I have to work to get paid. I believe the retainer method is the closest thing to getting back to what should matter–the doctor-patient relationship.
i agree totally.