<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An economist&#8217;s view of P4P</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/3419/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/3419</link>
	<description>Internal medicine, American health care, and especially medical education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Potentially Fatal Consequences of Allowing Insurance Companies To Direct Health Care - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/3419/comment-page-1#comment-524066</link>
		<dc:creator>The Potentially Fatal Consequences of Allowing Insurance Companies To Direct Health Care - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/index.php/archives/3419#comment-524066</guid>
		<description>[...] DB&#8217;s Medical Rants provided a quick summary of the problems in allowing  insurance companies or other third parties to dictate medical care as Kling believes is possible: I see three major flaws in all these arguments. First, these arguments always assume correct diagnoses. Correct diagnosis is a major problem in medicine. Second, these arguments focus on treating a disease, while many patients have multiple diseases. We have no evidence base on the management of multiple diseases. Third, these arguments discount the healing relationship which great physicians provide. Patients respond to reassurance, encouragement and empathy. The physician really can help improve quality of life independent of the specific prescriptions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DB&#8217;s Medical Rants provided a quick summary of the problems in allowing  insurance companies or other third parties to dictate medical care as Kling believes is possible: I see three major flaws in all these arguments. First, these arguments always assume correct diagnoses. Correct diagnosis is a major problem in medicine. Second, these arguments focus on treating a disease, while many patients have multiple diseases. We have no evidence base on the management of multiple diseases. Third, these arguments discount the healing relationship which great physicians provide. Patients respond to reassurance, encouragement and empathy. The physician really can help improve quality of life independent of the specific prescriptions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Covert Rationing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Patients, Doctors, and Remote Third Parties</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/3419/comment-page-1#comment-514682</link>
		<dc:creator>The Covert Rationing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Patients, Doctors, and Remote Third Parties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medrants.com/index.php/archives/3419#comment-514682</guid>
		<description>[...] DB&#8217;s Medical Rants points us to an interesting posting on EconLog, in which noted economist Arnold Kling, PhD (in answer to an essay by Richard Dolonar on the importance of individualizing clinical decisions) says, &#8220;My own view is that a remote third party probably can use statistical evidence to make good recommendations for a course of treatment.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DB&#8217;s Medical Rants points us to an interesting posting on EconLog, in which noted economist Arnold Kling, PhD (in answer to an essay by Richard Dolonar on the importance of individualizing clinical decisions) says, &#8220;My own view is that a remote third party probably can use statistical evidence to make good recommendations for a course of treatment.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

