How do we ration?

1

Category : Medical Rants

Apparently, the NHS (Great Britain) is considering their priorities. Doctors admit: NHS treatments must be rationed

It is about the money.

British doctors will take the historic step of admitting for the first time that many health treatments will be rationed in the future because the NHS cannot cope with spiralling demand from patients.

In a major report that will embarrass the government, the British Medical Association will say fertility treatment, plastic surgery and operations for varicose veins and minor childhood ailments, such as glue ear, are among a long list of procedures in jeopardy.

James Johnson, the BMA chairman, will warn that patients face a bleak future because they will increasingly be denied treatments. He will urge the NHS to be much more explicit about what it can realistically afford to do and ask political leaders to engage in an open, honest debate about rationing.

The BMA proposes the drawing up of a new patients’ charter specifying those health services to which every citizen across England should be entitled, regardless of the local health authority’s financial situation. They also want to see a second list of all the treatments which the sick will get only if their primary care trust has the money, and if doctors decide they are clinically worthwhile.

Senior BMA sources say their report recognises the reality that despite record investment in the NHS, ‘postcode lotteries’ are rife. Primary care trusts, the local NHS organisations that commission and pay for care from hospitals on behalf of patients, are increasingly rejecting requests to pay for procedures or drugs because they are not perceived to be the best use of funds.

Some PCTs have been bitterly criticised for refusing to pay for expensive new cancer drugs; treatment to prevent older people going blind through age-related eye degeneration and operations to help obese patients lose weight through stomach-stapling.

This is not a simple issue. I am not criticizing the NHS. Great Britain has made a choice about health care funding. Given limited resources, this becomes the only solution.

As a society, we must always ask how we want to invest our resources. Do we want to spend an ever increasing portion of the GNP on health care?

Our financial problems are not waste. Rather we can do more, but always at a cost. Our health care options are improving, but they do cost money.

I hope that we can do careful studies to prioritize spending should we face this problem in the US. I suspect, rather, that the decisions will depend on political considerations.

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen

Comments (1)

We already “ration” care in the U.S., though I have to admit that I despise this loaded term. Basically, this happens all the time in the free market allocation of resources. In the U.S., we “ration” indirectly by limiting access to any healthcare at all (via cost) for a large chunk of people while everyone else can access what they can afford or their insurance will pay for – coverage decisions made by the private sector but which are basically the same as those that the U.K. will supposedly have to make.

In the example discussed above, the U.K. is restricting access to specific treatments – not specific individuals or groups. This is just the basic nature of resource allocation when resources are not unlimited (i.e. reality). The only difference is the structure of the decision-making: hierarchical/centralized v. individual/decentralized/market-based.

One alternative to this dire inevitability – obvious yet strangely not addressed – would be to use the resources available in a more efficient manner. We do not need to spend a dime more on health care. We need value for what we do spend. For example: 2 trillion smackers is enough to keep the U.S. AND the U.K. in good health if we did not allocate it in such a way that seems only to ensure healthy profits.

Post a comment