Who should we vaccinate?

by rcentor on May 15, 2006

What should happen if we have a deadly flu epidemic? How do we prioritize who should receive the vaccine? This article discusses the ethical issues in a very interesting way. – Elderly Should Be Last for Pandemic Vaccine, Ethicists Argue

The sick and elderly should be last in line for scarce flu vaccine in a pandemic—rather than near the front of the queue—according to two bioethicists associated with the National Institutes of Health.

“I’m not trying to anger the elderly, but the fact of the matter is if we have a disaster we may have to ration,” said NIH clinical bioethics Ezekiel Emanuel, M.D., Ph.D., in an interview. That being so, he added, there must be decisions on priorities.

Both in terms of ethics and prudent public health planning for a flu pandemic, current plans in the U.S. and Canada have missed the boat, Dr. Emanuel and bioethicist Alan Wertheimer, Ph.D., argued in the May 12 issue of Science.

“This (paper) is not meant to be anti-anybody,” Dr. Emanuel said. “It’s meant to ask the questions what’s fair and what’s prudent in terms of public health.”

There’s no dispute about who should head the list. Current plans say that health care workers and people involved in vaccine production get the first doses if a pandemic begins and the bioethicists agree that’s the right choice.

But current plans also give higher priority to the elderly, sick, and infants. This is based on the long-standing principle that those most at risk of dying should get the first crack at treatments.

But next in line after health-care and vaccine workers, the bioethicists argued, should be healthy people between the ages of 13 and 40, followed by people on the fringes of that group—those ages seven to 12 and 41 to 50.

Who should we protect? How should we triage? While these issues are currently theoretic, they could become reality. These bioethicists have examined the issue from a societal perspective. They make explicit a difference in the value of individual lives to society.

We generally try to avoid such thoughts and discussions. However, I believe in this possible scenario, we must explicitly have exactly the discussions the bioethicists have championed.

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

The Grand Wazoo May 15, 2006 at 9:03 am

This subject is brought up earlier than I expected because it does make our society “squeamish” to think about it. Even if they set up rules and regulations regarding the vaccine, how would our society enforce it? Would we point a gun at grandma and tell her to get out of the line? I doubt that this ethical dilemma will ever be solved prior to the pandemic arriving.

BC May 15, 2006 at 9:14 am

As one who would probably rank toward the bottom portion of the list under such a rationing scheme, I fully support it nonetheless. Aside from giving first priority to health workers and vaccine producers, etc., this is just another variation of the QALY (quality adjusted life year) approach to rationing expensive and/or scarce or limited supply care, as they do in the UK, which I also support. While we have not embraced the QALY concept in the U.S. yet, I suspect we will in the near future, and that will probably be a good thing, in my view.

kitty May 15, 2006 at 9:22 am

Another consideration is who is more vulnerable to the particular strain of the virus? It isn’t always the case that elderly are more at risk than young and healthy. During the pandemic of 191819, younger and healthier people were more likelly to die and older people more likely to survive. In this case both the people who are more at risk and people who have longer to live are the same.
Another consideration is who is more likely to go out and meet people. I, for example, can easily work from home. Of course, I need to go and buy food and water, but still my exposure would be less than some of my friends who have to go to the office and have to use public transportation. So I’d imagine they should have higher priority.

Stingflower May 15, 2006 at 9:40 am

I rather suspect that it will turn out to be impossible, politically, to put the elderly anywhere but at the front of the list.

LM May 15, 2006 at 11:50 am

If distribution of the vaccine is anything like the situation regarding the usual influenza vaccine for the past two years, most of us are not going to worry about it because we will not be able to obtain vaccine for our patients. We will leave it up to the supermarkets, drug stores, convenience clinics, and local health departments to tell people whether they can have the vaccine or not.

Tara May 16, 2006 at 6:51 am

I feel that the eldery and sick should be at the back of the line. The children , young adults and then go up the line. The elderly dont have as many years left. I would rather see someone have 80 years then 10 or 15.

BC May 16, 2006 at 7:26 am

I agree with Tara 100% on this one. If our political system drives us to put the elderly at the front of the line just because a higher percentage of them vote than younger people, than shame on us.

Tom Huddle May 16, 2006 at 10:24 am

so traditional imperatives to protect the needy or vulnerable give way to utilitarian calculations as to who benefits most…

i’d like to see a bit more of a case as to just why we should exchange compassion for those in most need, surely an important part of our identity, for such calculations.

The Nittany Turkey May 20, 2006 at 6:45 pm

I have to agree that our self-interested politicians would misprioritize the triage approach to rationing vaccines. I’m 59, so I would be closer to the bottom of the list than the top, but I feel that we’ve got to keep the young and productive members of our society on their feet.

In The Bulls-Eye June 4, 2006 at 2:34 pm

I am a bit late to the discussion however, I must voice my opinion. When I first heard about bird flu I figured that might be my death nell. You see, I am in my early 60′s and have asthma and COPD. To catch a cold can be life threatening and certainly the bird flu is more than a rinovirus.

If the ethicists (and many others as evident by the previous posts) want to refuse me a place in the life line for vaccination, will they be kind enough to euthanize me? I think not! Will I be left to suffer and die because I was born too early to be young now? Yes.

Truth of the matter is that when and if we are hit by any pandemic, it will be mob rule just as it was in New Orleans, mob rule being those who can get out will and the rest will not. No one will be safe. You will need to provide for yourselves and if you think differently, maybe you need to think again.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: