<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2 bits, 4 bits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/2592/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2592</link>
	<description>Contemplating medicine and the health care system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:16:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Earthceuticals</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2592/comment-page-1#comment-520535</link>
		<dc:creator>Earthceuticals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/?p=2592#comment-520535</guid>
		<description>It is interesting none the less that the pharmaceutical companies are going for the attractive personality types as opposed to the well versed clinical types. I realize the two aren&#039;t mutually exclusive by rule, but be honest by practice we all know the two virtues if we can address them as such... rarely cross paths. To the pharma&#039;s defense, maybe they see the role of these reps less as educational partners and more as motivating the practitioners to choose medication x over medication y when all other factors are basically nondescript. It is nonetheless amusing copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting none the less that the pharmaceutical companies are going for the attractive personality types as opposed to the well versed clinical types. I realize the two aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive by rule, but be honest by practice we all know the two virtues if we can address them as such&#8230; rarely cross paths. To the pharma&#8217;s defense, maybe they see the role of these reps less as educational partners and more as motivating the practitioners to choose medication x over medication y when all other factors are basically nondescript. It is nonetheless amusing copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2592/comment-page-1#comment-101234</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/?p=2592#comment-101234</guid>
		<description>Pharma hired me with a science degree and an MBA, but I didn&#039;t get a mention in that article.  Nerds don&#039;t make for good copy.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pharma hired me with a science degree and an MBA, but I didn&#8217;t get a mention in that article.  Nerds don&#8217;t make for good copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: over my med body! &#187; It&#8217;s Time For Grand Rounds</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2592/comment-page-1#comment-96946</link>
		<dc:creator>over my med body! &#187; It&#8217;s Time For Grand Rounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/?p=2592#comment-96946</guid>
		<description>[...] If you didn&#8217;t see yesterday&#8217;s piece on Pharma hiring college cheerleaders to promote their products, look no further than DB&#8217;s Med Rants. The site updates us on the work of influence, something very important that we remember as physicians. Thanks DB! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you didn&#8217;t see yesterday&#8217;s piece on Pharma hiring college cheerleaders to promote their products, look no further than DB&#8217;s Med Rants. The site updates us on the work of influence, something very important that we remember as physicians. Thanks DB! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nd</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2592/comment-page-1#comment-96942</link>
		<dc:creator>nd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/?p=2592#comment-96942</guid>
		<description>Generally, our practice group (20 physicians spread out over 3 offices) gives about 5-10 minutes/week toward listening to reps  (or  120 seconds/day. )

most doc&#039;s make a token appearance for 2 minutes perhaps twice/week.   I am sure some practices will have more time to chat with reps .  We are so busy (primary care)that we have no time to waste,  lunch breaks are about 5 minutes.

I wish we had the luxury of down time.

many in our group have no contact ever  with reps.

I would guess that a major percentage of practices run the same way.  I am sure many other practices in other specialities have more time to waste and can have more exposure to reps.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, our practice group (20 physicians spread out over 3 offices) gives about 5-10 minutes/week toward listening to reps  (or  120 seconds/day. )</p>
<p>most doc&#8217;s make a token appearance for 2 minutes perhaps twice/week.   I am sure some practices will have more time to chat with reps .  We are so busy (primary care)that we have no time to waste,  lunch breaks are about 5 minutes.</p>
<p>I wish we had the luxury of down time.</p>
<p>many in our group have no contact ever  with reps.</p>
<p>I would guess that a major percentage of practices run the same way.  I am sure many other practices in other specialities have more time to waste and can have more exposure to reps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious JD</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2592/comment-page-1#comment-96599</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/?p=2592#comment-96599</guid>
		<description>&quot;To borrow from Bill Oâ€™Reilly, my practice is a no spin zone.&quot;

This makes me chuckle.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To borrow from Bill Oâ€™Reilly, my practice is a no spin zone.&#8221;</p>
<p>This makes me chuckle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
