<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malpractice &#8211; an international problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/2533/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2533</link>
	<description>Internal medicine, American health care, and especially medical education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediMundi - Medical Travel</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2533/comment-page-1#comment-520604</link>
		<dc:creator>MediMundi - Medical Travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/?p=2533#comment-520604</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just medical personnel traveling to discuss high premiums...  Patients are beginning to travel around the world in search of less expensive healthcare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just medical personnel traveling to discuss high premiums&#8230;  Patients are beginning to travel around the world in search of less expensive healthcare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medical Malpractice Attorneys</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2533/comment-page-1#comment-517879</link>
		<dc:creator>Medical Malpractice Attorneys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/?p=2533#comment-517879</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What Went Wrong?  Proving Medical Malpractice...&lt;/strong&gt;

Medical malpractice, though usually defined rather broadly in the court of public opinion, is often difficult to prove in a court of law. Extensive criteria must be met for malpractice to be found by a court of law, and fully two-thirds of all medical ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What Went Wrong?  Proving Medical Malpractice&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Medical malpractice, though usually defined rather broadly in the court of public opinion, is often difficult to prove in a court of law. Extensive criteria must be met for malpractice to be found by a court of law, and fully two-thirds of all medical &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious JD</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2533/comment-page-1#comment-73972</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 22:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/?p=2533#comment-73972</guid>
		<description>Clearly, the only solution is for all physicians everywhere to have immunity for their acts and no ceiling on what they can earn.  

Any faults in the current delivery of health care, including doctor-patient communication, reimbursement levels, physicians&#039; unwillingness to reprimand actual malpractice, etc. are the fault of lawyers and the civil justice system.  Physicians themselves bear no responsibility and should not be held accountable as long as jury trials continue.  

Anesthesiologists success in reforming their own practices notwithstanding.

&quot;Our legislators (with the majority being lawyers) generally refrain from limiting the right to sue.&quot;

That is quite possibly the most ignorant of all of physicians&#039; uninformed opinions on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, the only solution is for all physicians everywhere to have immunity for their acts and no ceiling on what they can earn.  </p>
<p>Any faults in the current delivery of health care, including doctor-patient communication, reimbursement levels, physicians&#8217; unwillingness to reprimand actual malpractice, etc. are the fault of lawyers and the civil justice system.  Physicians themselves bear no responsibility and should not be held accountable as long as jury trials continue.  </p>
<p>Anesthesiologists success in reforming their own practices notwithstanding.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our legislators (with the majority being lawyers) generally refrain from limiting the right to sue.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is quite possibly the most ignorant of all of physicians&#8217; uninformed opinions on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rangel MD</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2533/comment-page-1#comment-72107</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rangel MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/?p=2533#comment-72107</guid>
		<description>A medical-related injury must have been avoidable!?!?!? You mean actual MAL-Practice must have occurred?? What the hell kind of standard is that? I like the American system where we shoot first and . . hope for a huge jury award.

*turns off sarcasm*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A medical-related injury must have been avoidable!?!?!? You mean actual MAL-Practice must have occurred?? What the hell kind of standard is that? I like the American system where we shoot first and . . hope for a huge jury award.</p>
<p>*turns off sarcasm*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

