<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rangel on PVS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/2320/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2320</link>
	<description>Internal medicine, American health care, and especially medical education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2320/comment-page-1#comment-17068</link>
		<dc:creator>John Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2005/03/30/rangel-on-pvs/#comment-17068</guid>
		<description>I agree with what he says about general cases of this type. But there has been a lot of wierdness, both legally and medically (Mr. Schiavo has the authority to order that her &lt;i&gt;teeth not be brushed??!!??)&lt;/i&gt; on all (husband, parents, lawyers for both sides) fronts of this &lt;i&gt;particular&lt;/i&gt; case. 
===========
 
My comment(s) to Rangel: 
 
I agree with a lot of your post, in that I fear she is &lt;i&gt;now&lt;/i&gt; PVS, but (of course, heh-heh) not all. E.g. &quot;Mrs. Schiavoâ€™s cerebral cortex has been almost completely destroyed (by a lack of oxygen from her cardiac arrest in 1990)&quot; is at least partially disputed by 
---------- 
If you look carefully at this time line you will see that Terri had &quot;NORMAL&quot; CT&#039;s of the brain on 2/25 and 2/27.

STOP THE PRESSES

There is categorically and absolutely NO WAY Terri could have suffered MASSIVE ANOXIC INJURY TO THE BRAIN ON 2/25 AND HAVE NORMAL CT SCAN ON 2/27
--------- 

and it seems it was not until March 19 that even the EEG was &quot;markedly abnormal&quot; - it had actually been improving until about then. 

Lots more at 
http://codeblueblog.blogs.com/codeblueblog/ 

2:10 AM 
===== 
Oops, forgot to add - 
http://grahamlester.typepad.com/point2point/2005/03/british_study_f.html 
from the BMJ - &quot;Results: Of the 40 patients referred as being in the vegetative state, 17 (43%) were considered as having been misdiagnosed; seven of these had been presumed to be vegetative for longer than one year, including three for over four years.&quot; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what he says about general cases of this type. But there has been a lot of wierdness, both legally and medically (Mr. Schiavo has the authority to order that her <i>teeth not be brushed??!!??)</i> on all (husband, parents, lawyers for both sides) fronts of this <i>particular</i> case.<br />
===========</p>
<p>My comment(s) to Rangel: </p>
<p>I agree with a lot of your post, in that I fear she is <i>now</i> PVS, but (of course, heh-heh) not all. E.g. &#8220;Mrs. Schiavoâ€™s cerebral cortex has been almost completely destroyed (by a lack of oxygen from her cardiac arrest in 1990)&#8221; is at least partially disputed by<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
If you look carefully at this time line you will see that Terri had &#8220;NORMAL&#8221; CT&#8217;s of the brain on 2/25 and 2/27.</p>
<p>STOP THE PRESSES</p>
<p>There is categorically and absolutely NO WAY Terri could have suffered MASSIVE ANOXIC INJURY TO THE BRAIN ON 2/25 AND HAVE NORMAL CT SCAN ON 2/27<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; </p>
<p>and it seems it was not until March 19 that even the EEG was &#8220;markedly abnormal&#8221; &#8211; it had actually been improving until about then. </p>
<p>Lots more at<br />
<a href="http://codeblueblog.blogs.com/codeblueblog/" rel="nofollow">http://codeblueblog.blogs.com/codeblueblog/</a> </p>
<p>2:10 AM<br />
=====<br />
Oops, forgot to add &#8211;<br />
<a href="http://grahamlester.typepad.com/point2point/2005/03/british_study_f.html" rel="nofollow">http://grahamlester.typepad.com/point2point/2005/03/british_study_f.html</a><br />
from the BMJ &#8211; &#8220;Results: Of the 40 patients referred as being in the vegetative state, 17 (43%) were considered as having been misdiagnosed; seven of these had been presumed to be vegetative for longer than one year, including three for over four years.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

