Report Cards for Doctors? Grades Are Likely to Be A, B, C . . . and I
The prospect of a report card in my future always reminds me of a diabetic woman from my past. She spent the year after her divorce sitting on her couch eating ice cream straight from the carton. Her medications went untouched. She still came in to see us quite a bit, but she refused to be weighed, refused to have her blood pressure measured, refused antidepressants, refused to see a psychiatrist. Her blood sugar ran so high the lab invariably called us in a panic. We tried everything; nothing worked.
I felt terrible for her, but had anyone been grading me on my management of diabetes that year, I would have felt even worse for myself because I would have flunked. She would have brought me right down with her. With my reputation (or a cash bonus) at stake, would I have done better at taking care of her? Or would I instead have begun to hate her for bringing down my “diabetes” grade and lowering my income? Would I eventually have told her just to stay home until she could behave, so at least my failure to make her better was not so visible in the record? Would we have lost her trust then for good?
Eventually the patient pulled herself together and got her sugar back under control. She thanked us for all we had done for her in the interim. We thought we hadn’t done much, and certainly the quality mavens would have agreed. But sometimes quality of care transcends the usual markers.
Rewarding doctors for good outcomes may well work out fine. Still, I can’t quite forget the edge in the eye doctor’s voice when she spoke about patients who weren’t doing quite as well as she would have liked. A real dislike hid behind all her cheery disclaimers. Her failures, as she saw them, badly interfered with her self-image. She wanted nothing to do with them.
Of course, when she and all the rest of us are prodded to pursue good outcomes with grades and merit bonuses, we will all still have our failures. Will we have the strength to stand by them, or will we just tell them all to stay home?
The essayist raises one of several important issues about report cards. We already see this issue affect surgeons’ decision making. Many surgeons are reluctant to operate on the more complex, sicker patients because it may adversely affect their mortality statistics.
Will report cards lead to “cherry picking” or increased firing of patients? We must be ready for the unintended consequences which could occur once we have pay for performance.
One way to avoid this is to evaluate process rather than outcome. If one documents that the patient refuses to have an eye exam, a process measure could still give one credit for offering the eye exam.
I also worry about how one constructs the report card. Do we give one summary score? If so, do we value each measure equally, or do we have a weighting scheme. We have done research (presented in abstract form) which shows that physicians do not weight various process measures as having equivalent importance. The weighting scheme could affect ones overall grade.
I hope we have intelligent researchers involved in studying pay for performance. They should consider these and other issues.
Will our report cards really measure physician quality? We measure “low hanging fruit”. We may be victims of this old joke (cited previously on this blog):
Hooker liked good living and high times, so let’s share a joke in his memory. A man sees his drunken friend circling a lampost at night. “What are you doing there Bill?†“I’m looking for my house key.†“But you lost it in the tavern, Bill.†“I know, but there’s more light here.â€
I believe that report cards can have a positive impact. I suspect that impact to be modest, as the report cards will only address process on common quality issues. They cannot possibly evaluate skills like diagnostic acumen, bedside manner and recognition of drug side-effects.
We (physicians, and especially academic physicians) must point out these issues to everyone who might listen. Report cards are an interesting idea, but are they really a good idea? Will they pervert our focus? Will they really improve medical care?
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
4 Responses to Concern over pay for performance
CHenry
March 1st, 2005 at 4:27 pm
One problem with “report cards”from third-party payors is that those doing the reporting have an interest in the outcome of the report, and not one necessarily congruent with those of the patients or the doctors. If there is a payment held back, either as a strict percentage (very bad) or as a fund obtained from generalized discounting of all services (almost as bad), the organization doing the grading has an interest in finding fault and withholding funds. Even if some performers are “rewarded” for meeting a particular standard, that does not necessarily mean the rewards offset the penalties.
Another problem is that these schemes inevitably lead to early referral (dumping) to avoid populating panels with patients with intractable and hard-to-control problems.
So that morbidly obese, depressed diabetic with uncontrolled serum glucose and hypertension now becomes a financial and professional liability instead of being just a difficult clinical challenge. In the present climate where caring for difficult problems and patients is already unreasonably discounted, squeezing the physician with one more screw seems particularly unjust. Why haven’t the insurers and Medicare considered giving the compliant patients a break on their premiums instead?
Maybe there needs to be an independent evaluating organization to decide who meets standards of excellence in practice. Consider a Consumers Union or Underwriters Laboratories certification for medical practices. Patients who choose providers who earn good ratings get a break on their monthly premiums, but patients can choose to go wherever they want. The incentive would exist for the practice to meet high standards and the incentive would exist for the patients to choose practices that held high standards.
Donald E. L. Johnson
March 1st, 2005 at 5:12 pm
Robert,
Been awhile since I’ve been here. Great new design, except for one thing. Where are the permalinks and trackbacks? Am I missing something?
Don.
DB’s Medical Rants » More on report cards
March 9th, 2005 at 7:18 pm
[...] rove care, but the may harm overall care I discussed this issue in some depth last week – Concern over pay for performance [...]
DB’s Medical Rants » Quality - the number one issue
May 31st, 2005 at 9:47 am
[...] measures will soon lead to pay for performance. I have recently ranted on this subject – Concern over pay for performance. Despite our concerns, the train is c [...]