On Med-Mal Courts

Dear researcher

Recently I was handed information on two scientists named Mitchnicof and Milicof. These two Russian Research scientists found a cure for tuberculosis in 1912. They noticed that tumors of the disease form a

Wax barrier the immune system cannot penetrate. They found a moth that lays its eggs in beehives. When the larvae hatch they begin to secrete an enzyme that dissolves the beeswax. Once dissolved the bugs then eat it. The two men then extracted this enzyme from the beehive. It was then aerosolled into the lungs of their patients. In six weeks the wax barriers were removed and immune systems got through to cure the disease. The patients were permanently cured. They had a natural immunity to re-infection. This aspect would halt the disease entirely. Once cured you cannot get any form of it again.

I thought this might be an urban legend so I compared modern chemistry to its findings. Baking Soda is produced by our respiratory system. It has two functions: One it balances the PH of our lungs so CO2 mixed with water will not eat up our lungs. CO2 with water forms hydro-carbonic acid. I put coal in a bottle of carbonated water, No affect it will not dissolve it. Then I put coal in baking soda and water, it dissolved. I then put butter in baking soda and warm water; the butter went into solution The enzyme the moths were secreting was a base chemical like baking soda. The cure for tuberculosis is right in front of our eyes. Baking soda solution is a natural chemical present in our lungs. If we aerosol a stronger solution into patients lungs the wax will dissolve and the disease will be cured by their immune systems.

A cure for leprosy is the same thing, but maybe easier, Ammonia is a base chemical. Soaking the affected limbs in a light solution will dissolve the wax barrier. Also a stringent diet of no sugars, breads and low fats will help to remove the barrier from the inside. This gives a new meaning to the Phrase piss on it.

Ammonia is present in urine. So two major diseases can be cured with inexpensive means. Tuberculosis patients should also avoid sugars and heavy fats.

Our conclusion: The story of the two Russian scientists is not an urban legend but may only point to a chemical we can synthesize without moths. If one researcher is not interested it does not matter. We are sending this out to every researcher, hospital and news organization we can. As they say in star track “resistance is futile they will be assimilated.” Just thought everyone might want to jump on this before the truth embarrasses them. If people, whose relatives have died from the present flaws in treatment, see this, then prove it works, It will open doctors to tremendous lawsuits. We will win. They will be out of business in a short time. Baking soda may also help treat allergenic reaction in people who genetically have too little natural soda in their lungs. Lung cancers with wax coatings will also be cured. And it will help to remove tars from smoking from lung tissue. They need to put greed aside and treat patients or they will no longer treat anyone. May God help them to accept the truth. God Bless you and your families. We are only interested in taking down those who serve the root of all evil “The love of money and materialism.” Michael J C Kingdom

This development will help mountain climbers and pilots because baking soda also opens the tissues to be able to absorb and exhale CO2. It will also help asthma and cystic fibrosis if they are caused by a lack of lung soda production. Irritated lung tissue produces more mucus to protect cells during healing. Pneumonia and lungs burned by hot gas will also heal faster if protected by soda inhalation. Doctors are too worried about money if they served their God and their oath
instead of money and high living they would have been given this cure. If I had put down the alchohol sooner my dad would not have died. This paper was handed to me a year before he died from lung problems.

Interesting that you find the right to trial by jury, one of the reasons we fought the revolutionary war for, unseemly.

Matt and Bernie ought to read a book by respected legal scholar Cass R. Sunstein -PUNITIVE DAMAGES – to learn more about the role of jury awards in medical and other lawsuits. Sunstein and his co-authors found jury awards to be irrational, erratic, and undependable and felt that juries, particularly in malpractice suits, should be replaced. Medical malpractice courts would be much better in assessing the complexities of medicine than lay jurors who have no medical background.

Matt, I’m making a distinction here with medical malpractice lawsuits where much more expertise is needed than in other cases. Appeal to emotions and the use of junk science, as we have seen in cases of cerebral palsy and so-called silicone-induced autoimmune disorders, would not pass muster with medical malpractice panels.

As for the awards, reasonable guidelines can be established beyond the frequently abused practice of reaching into the deep pockets of physicians and their insurance companies.

RGL,

Why are we giving up constitutional rights because some insurance companies are squeezing doctors?

Matt,

You are using a wrong premise, so that is the wrong question to ask.

Rather, you should be asking: Why do avaricious trial lawyers always object to ideas that would make the law a better instrument to serve the ends of justice for all? Why is it all about money?

Doctors, along with their insurance companies, are reeling from the crushing burdens imposed by a tort system that has benefitted mainly the trial lawyers. Patients ultimately are the victims.

Please face the truth, Matt. Tort reform is on the way, regardless of how you continue to defend the ramparts of a system that are crumbling.

Matt, there is no use continuing this discussion with you if you resort to cheap name-calling. I can call you worse names but I will not descend to that level. Bye!

RGL,

I didn’t mean it to be name calling. But what other conclusion can one reach when the other side believes that tort reform will lower health care costs? Perhaps I should have called it misguided faith? Like a 30 year old believing in Santa Claus.

Or perhaps you’re just resorting to the name calling cry because you don’t want to admit that you’ve never seen the inside of a courtroom and truthfully have no idea exactly what happens in there?

Or you don’t want to admit that this is the third medical malpractice “crisis” in 30 years, and is even occurring in states that enacted caps last time?

Or you don’t want to admit that the insurers themselves say caps on damages will have minimal, if any effect on premiums?

Or you don’t want to admit that insurers made money hand over fist in the 90s?

Or you don’t want to admit that in exchange for gutting access to the civil justice system, not a single insurer has promised to save a single doctor a dollar in rates?

Dan, what else can one call the other side but intellectually dishonest, when they attempt to use California’s MICRA as proof that caps work yet fail to mention that rates didn’t slow there until Prop 103, insurance reform, was enacted?

If that is not the definition of intellectually dishonest, what is?

Matt – I call them uninformed, until someone who actually knows something about California informs them – as you have.

The fact that the insurance industry’s present efforts are focused, 100%, on the most meritorious claims with the most significant injuries to malpractice victims, with 0% of the attention paid to “frivolous” lawsuits, makes rather plain that they are not presently concerned with either frivolous litigation or justice for malpractice victims. If doctors thought about that a bit harder, perhaps they would be calling for reforms of the insurance industry – which proved highly effective at reining in malpractice insurance premiums, for example, in California – instead of jumping on the insurance industry’s self-serving bandwagon.