Epidemiologic studies taught us that as a woman increases her sexual partners, she more likely will develop cervical cancer. More recently we have learned that infection with certain strains of HPV (the human papilloma virus) causes cervical cancer.
Now we have data showing that we can prevent cervical cancer using a new HPV vaccine – Vaccine Against HPV Strain Protects Against High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia
Therefore, the investigative team randomized 2,391 women aged 16 to 23 years to receive three doses of placebo or a vaccine consisting of HPV 16 virus-like particles (VLP). The vaccine, given in 40-µg doses, was administered at day 0 and then at month 2 and month 6. The investigators also obtained genital samples for HPV 16 DNA at day 0, month 7, and then every six months through month 48; the participants also underwent a Pap test at those visits.
The analysis population included women who completed the entire vaccine regimen, were negative for HPV 16 through month 7, and completed at least one additional visit. Patients underwent colposcopies and cervical biopsies as clinically indicated.
Of the 750 placebo recipients who met the criteria for evaluation, the investigators documented 12 cases of HPV 16–related CIN 2-3, six of which were CIN 2 and six of which were CIN 3. Of the 755 vaccinees, no such events were observed, for a vaccine efficiency of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65% – 100%).
Through the end of the study, 111 subjects in the placebo group developed persistent HPV 16 infection compared with seven subjects in the vaccination group, for a vaccine efficacy of 94% (95% CI, 88% – 98%). After immunization, HPV 16 antibody titers peaked at month 7 (GMT 1519 mMu/mL) and declined through month 18 (GMT 202 mMu/mL). The titers remained relatively stable from month 30 through the study’s end (GMTs range, 128 – 150 mMu/mL).
“After three and a half years of follow-up, we concluded that the vaccine was able to prevent clinical cervical disease,” Dr. Mao said. “That’s the first time that’s been done in a human study. The next step will be to complete phase 3 trials of an ongoing study of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine, which also looks at men and children. If the vaccine is safe and effective, it would make sense to immunize children and young adolescents before they become sexually active.” Men are being studied for the quadrivalent vaccine because HPV is sexually transmitted, Dr. Mao said.
I have heard rumors that this vaccine (produced by Merck) either has received or will soon receive approval. This vaccine will probably become standard for adolescents. Of course that assumes that adolescents have sex. And that is probably an easy assumption to make.
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
1 Response to Vaccinating against cervical cancer
Sylvain
October 21st, 2005 at 7:43 am
I have some strong doubts on the validity of this study for the following reasons:
755 were vacinated, and 750 placebo recipients meeting the criteria for evaluation. Obviously, it is assumed that both groups did not have HPV prior to the experiment.
At the end of the test period, 111 placebo recipients out of 750 developped “persistent infection”.
Now, a placebo group is supposed to be a group which receive no active agent, and whose behaviour is left unchanged.
If so, can somebody explain how come 111 persons (14%), originally NOT affected by the HPV, developped HPV within the time frame of the study? Does it mean that HPV is spreading at a 14% percent rate in the general population? (which would mean that at least 40% of the women would be currently infected)
This spread in the placebo group is suspiciously high, which indicate major tampering with the placebo group.
This is a sexually transmitted disease, therefore the parameters of who these girls had sex with and under what circumstances are of major importance. Yet, the study doesn’t mention anything on that subject, which is a very serious omission.
Based on the above, I strongly suspect the experiment has been tampered with.
I also note that the original group is 2,391 women. Yet, only 1505 of them “met the criteria for evaluation”. Hum. What was the criteria for evaluation? Does it mean that the remaining 886 women had already contracted HPV prior to the testing period? Were any of these 886 women vaccinated and then left aside in the results because they were not showing the desired results?
If these 886 women did not meet the evaluation criteria, why are they even counted as participating to the study? Unless it means they were dropped out after the begining of the testing period, which is a sure way to tamper the results.