<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Marcia Angell&#8217;s book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/2084/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2084</link>
	<description>Internal medicine, American health care, and especially medical education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: swift</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2084/comment-page-1#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/13/more-on-marcia-angells-book/#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>Bear in mind, however, I&#039;m still a fan of your single pricing idea. But I doubt that we&#039;ll ever see such a scenario in the real world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bear in mind, however, I&#8217;m still a fan of your single pricing idea. But I doubt that we&#8217;ll ever see such a scenario in the real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swift</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2084/comment-page-1#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/13/more-on-marcia-angells-book/#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>All the drug company apologists must be on vacation.

In that Times interview, Angell gives an assessment of the Medicare prescription drug benefit: &quot;...the main Medicare drug benefit that goes into effect in 2006 is designed to funnel billions of dollars to the pharmaceutical industry. It&#039;s an absolute bonanza for it. The pharmaceutical industry&#039;s lobbyists made certain that the legislation contained a provision barring Medicare from negotiating drug prices. Interestingly, the federal government negotiates drug prices for the Veterans Affairs system and gets very low prices because it is a bulk purchaser. And Medicare would have been the biggest bulk purchaser of all - so it could have negotiated very low prices. That provision allows the drug companies to continue raising their prices faster than the inflation rate, and the drug benefit will soon become unaffordable.&quot;

Would allowing Medicare to negotiate drug pricing have been an example of &quot;over regualting the pharmaceutical industry&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the drug company apologists must be on vacation.</p>
<p>In that Times interview, Angell gives an assessment of the Medicare prescription drug benefit: &#8220;&#8230;the main Medicare drug benefit that goes into effect in 2006 is designed to funnel billions of dollars to the pharmaceutical industry. It&#8217;s an absolute bonanza for it. The pharmaceutical industry&#8217;s lobbyists made certain that the legislation contained a provision barring Medicare from negotiating drug prices. Interestingly, the federal government negotiates drug prices for the Veterans Affairs system and gets very low prices because it is a bulk purchaser. And Medicare would have been the biggest bulk purchaser of all &#8211; so it could have negotiated very low prices. That provision allows the drug companies to continue raising their prices faster than the inflation rate, and the drug benefit will soon become unaffordable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Would allowing Medicare to negotiate drug pricing have been an example of &#8220;over regualting the pharmaceutical industry&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Machi</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2084/comment-page-1#comment-4603</link>
		<dc:creator>Machi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/13/more-on-marcia-angells-book/#comment-4603</guid>
		<description>By the way, Graham&#039;s review is very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Graham&#8217;s review is very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Machi</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2084/comment-page-1#comment-4602</link>
		<dc:creator>Machi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/13/more-on-marcia-angells-book/#comment-4602</guid>
		<description>Read the entire article. Then think carefully about the consequences of the PHARMA ad on Dr. Miller&#039;s biography page.
Then go read Dr. Angell&#039;s book.  Here&#039;s another interview with her:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/14/health/policy/14conv.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the entire article. Then think carefully about the consequences of the PHARMA ad on Dr. Miller&#8217;s biography page.<br />
Then go read Dr. Angell&#8217;s book.  Here&#8217;s another interview with her:<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/14/health/policy/14conv.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/14/health/policy/14conv.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2084/comment-page-1#comment-4600</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/13/more-on-marcia-angells-book/#comment-4600</guid>
		<description>And then there&#039;s an unpublished &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizen.org/publications/release.cfm?ID=7065&quot;&gt;NIH study from 2000 saying that NIH money was important in many drugs&lt;/a&gt;, so go figure.

The $800m line is absolutely bogus as well, and I&#039;m sure Dr. Miller knows it, too. He completely ignores a good 50% of the book in his criticism... read it first and then decide. It&#039;s a very fast read.

I posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grahamazon.com/anatomy/2004/september/angell_v_big_pharma.php&quot;&gt;my own review&lt;/a&gt; last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then there&#8217;s an unpublished <a href="http://www.citizen.org/publications/release.cfm?ID=7065">NIH study from 2000 saying that NIH money was important in many drugs</a>, so go figure.</p>
<p>The $800m line is absolutely bogus as well, and I&#8217;m sure Dr. Miller knows it, too. He completely ignores a good 50% of the book in his criticism&#8230; read it first and then decide. It&#8217;s a very fast read.</p>
<p>I posted <a href="http://www.grahamazon.com/anatomy/2004/september/angell_v_big_pharma.php">my own review</a> last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

