<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Canadian system in trouble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/2083/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2083</link>
	<description>Contemplating medicine and the health care system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:42:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2083/comment-page-1#comment-4599</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/12/the-canadian-system-in-trouble/#comment-4599</guid>
		<description>There are a few other interesting facts in the article - such as the Canadian &quot;crisis&quot; is that 15% of Canadians don&#039;t have a primary care physician, versus 20% in the United States.

Or that the big example with which they conclude the story is about a patient who went to the E.R. to get cysts treated on her ears because if she just showed up at her family doctor&#039;s office he wouldn&#039;t have put her treatment ahead of all of his patients with appointments. Something that has nothing to do with a shortage of primary care physicians.

The root of the &quot;primary care physician&quot; shortage in the U.S. and Canada seems to emerge in no small part from the trend toward specialization and subspecialization - which in most fields of medicine seems to be the path to higher income and greater prestige.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few other interesting facts in the article &#8211; such as the Canadian &#8220;crisis&#8221; is that 15% of Canadians don&#8217;t have a primary care physician, versus 20% in the United States.</p>
<p>Or that the big example with which they conclude the story is about a patient who went to the E.R. to get cysts treated on her ears because if she just showed up at her family doctor&#8217;s office he wouldn&#8217;t have put her treatment ahead of all of his patients with appointments. Something that has nothing to do with a shortage of primary care physicians.</p>
<p>The root of the &#8220;primary care physician&#8221; shortage in the U.S. and Canada seems to emerge in no small part from the trend toward specialization and subspecialization &#8211; which in most fields of medicine seems to be the path to higher income and greater prestige.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2083/comment-page-1#comment-4598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 02:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/12/the-canadian-system-in-trouble/#comment-4598</guid>
		<description>When I saw the title of your latest post I feared it was going to be (yet another) swipe at Canadian/ Uk health care by an American, insisting that our health care is the &#039;best&#039; and &#039;there is no such thing as an uninsured problem&#039; and &#039;all those data about infant mortality misses the point because our system is the best in the world&#039; etc etc ad nauseum.

It isn&#039;t. Thanks for a balanced view. No country in the world has a system working perfectly, and people who point to weaknesses elsewhere while saying &#039;there is nothing there that we can use here&#039; are being really disingenous.

The problem about generalists that you point out is common in most systems. I think it has to do not only with the larger health care bureaucracy in all these countries but also with the way medicine itself is changing from within, as well as remuneration issues. In the US, another important factor is litigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the title of your latest post I feared it was going to be (yet another) swipe at Canadian/ Uk health care by an American, insisting that our health care is the &#8216;best&#8217; and &#8216;there is no such thing as an uninsured problem&#8217; and &#8216;all those data about infant mortality misses the point because our system is the best in the world&#8217; etc etc ad nauseum.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t. Thanks for a balanced view. No country in the world has a system working perfectly, and people who point to weaknesses elsewhere while saying &#8216;there is nothing there that we can use here&#8217; are being really disingenous.</p>
<p>The problem about generalists that you point out is common in most systems. I think it has to do not only with the larger health care bureaucracy in all these countries but also with the way medicine itself is changing from within, as well as remuneration issues. In the US, another important factor is litigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB's Medical Rants &#187; Understanding increased health care costs</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2083/comment-page-1#comment-4649</link>
		<dc:creator>DB's Medical Rants &#187; Understanding increased health care costs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/12/the-canadian-system-in-trouble/#comment-4649</guid>
		<description>[...] s are increasing because patients are getting greater value .  One example of such posts - &lt;a href=&quot;http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/12/the-canadian-system-in-trouble/&quot;&gt;The Canadian system in trouble&lt;/a&gt; 	Today&#8217;s NY Times has another perspe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] s are increasing because patients are getting greater value .  One example of such posts &#8211; <a href="http://medrants.com/archives/2004/09/12/the-canadian-system-in-trouble/">The Canadian system in trouble</a> 	Today&#8217;s NY Times has another perspe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
