<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving care &#8211; but why should the physician pay?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/2044/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2044</link>
	<description>Internal medicine, American health care, and especially medical education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2044/comment-page-1#comment-4393</link>
		<dc:creator>American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/08/11/improving-care-but-why-should-the-physician-pay/#comment-4393</guid>
		<description>This type of modernization is a big part of Kerry’s healthcare plan. It provides incentives to encourage providers to upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This type of modernization is a big part of Kerry’s healthcare plan. It provides incentives to encourage providers to upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arf</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2044/comment-page-1#comment-4385</link>
		<dc:creator>arf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/08/11/improving-care-but-why-should-the-physician-pay/#comment-4385</guid>
		<description>How about the payment problem that&#039;s been staring us in the face for decades?

A pay cut of about 15% if you practice in rural areas.

That&#039;s the typical pay differential with the government entitlement programs, and many of the bigger private players (Blue Shield, for example) if you practice in rural areas.

Then they wonder why they can&#039;t get docs to practice in rural America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the payment problem that&#8217;s been staring us in the face for decades?</p>
<p>A pay cut of about 15% if you practice in rural areas.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the typical pay differential with the government entitlement programs, and many of the bigger private players (Blue Shield, for example) if you practice in rural areas.</p>
<p>Then they wonder why they can&#8217;t get docs to practice in rural America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietStorm</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/2044/comment-page-1#comment-4384</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietStorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2004/08/11/improving-care-but-why-should-the-physician-pay/#comment-4384</guid>
		<description>If physicians make more money from worse care (more complications equals more admissions, consultations etc) than this program seems balanced, if illogical. What is needed is payment based on quality of care- which I realize is a difficult proposition but is the only way to align payments with patient desires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If physicians make more money from worse care (more complications equals more admissions, consultations etc) than this program seems balanced, if illogical. What is needed is payment based on quality of care- which I realize is a difficult proposition but is the only way to align payments with patient desires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

