What this man needed was a doctor!

by rcentor on July 8, 2004

The Person Was Inside the Patient, but the Doctors Never Met Him

What the doctors never really seemed to appreciate was that Bill was much more than a dialysis patient. He knew the half-life of radioactive phosphorus, where all the soldiers had fallen at Verdun, when to underlead an ace at bridge. He knew where every country on the map is, or was, and what it was called then or now. He knew the name of the captain of the doomed cruiser Indianapolis, whether the Brahms octaves were being rattled off without a dropped note, how the young Joan Sutherland became a diva.

Bill had a lethal tennis backhand, played the piano beautifully, never got lost while driving, understood the innards of a cancer-therapy machine and had friends in most of the 50 states.

But he couldn’t keep track of which doctor was in charge of what. He couldn’t understand why doctors were so slow to call him back and why they didn’t talk to one another. Why didn’t they check on the medications they had prescribed or someone else had unprescribed? Why did he need this new test, which the other doctor said he didn’t need?

Most of all, Bill never understood why all these nice doctors didn’t have a few minutes to talk to him.

Current medical practice has borrowed too much from the industrial model. We talk about productivity, RVUs (relative value units), and billing codes. We rarely have time to talk about patient care.

Over the past 5 years, I have transitioned from a part-time outpatient practice with 2 months a year of ward attending, to doing 5-6 months each year of ward attending. In the hospital I have a better chance to know the patient. I can role model the doctor patient relationship without worrying that my “productivity” – oh, how I hate that word – will suffer.

We need to return to first principles. The reason we became physicians was to care for people, not patients! By that I mean, caring for the patient, rather than the disease.

We need a revolution in our thinking. This revolution actually is occuring in retainer practices and cash only practices. Patients will, I believe, be willing to pay a reasonable amount to get personalized health care.

The patient in the story above needed a conductor. He had wonderful performers from various parts of the symphony, but that symphony lacked a conductor. We need a health care system that pays the conductor. We, general internists, make great conductors. We like that role. We just need to understand how to make a living doing what we know is right and what patients desire. That is my wish today.

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

CHenry July 8, 2004 at 12:03 pm

We need a climate where doctors can insist on a direct doctor-patient relationship, in use of time and in compensation for work done. That does not always mean that the relationship will cost more, but it may mean that patients will have to be persuaded,and hopefully not forced, to accept first responsibility for paying their doctor, and then take on responsibility for dealing with whatever insurer they are contracting with afterward.

The productivity model is borne of the costly administrative burden, and the predatory opportunism that has marked the hird-party payment system we have come to accept. Insurers are not directly accountable to their customers, and the costs of their non-performance are multiplied when doctors have to build an administrative enterprise that has to deal with those insurers.

RGL July 8, 2004 at 5:21 pm

A dialysis center catering to a large number of patients has the atmosphere of a factory. Patients are shuttled in and out, with a boob tube to watch or magazines to read. What is missing is the human touch, the caring and warmth we need to give to patients. The business concerns have overtaken our instincts to care and comfort sick human beings.

Unless it’s a multispecialty practice, internists who can
coordinate care and spend time with patients are generally absent from the scene, as in this case. Neprhologists, while good at what they do, cannot function in that integrative role like internists.

I’m amazed the widow of this patient still had the wits around her, with her experiences, to tell America what the failings are of our health system. Her story is disturbing and should serve as a wake-up call on what our primary functions are as doctors.

The late Dr. George Peabody said it best: THE SECRET IN TAKING CARE OF THE PATIENT IS IN CARING FOR THE PATIENT.

m July 8, 2004 at 7:46 pm

too many people have entrenched interests (other than patient care) and will not admit that the reimbursement system is rotten
in concept, spirit and practice.

solution: Practice simply, ethically, with our independence….time to walk away from the managed care system.

Bernie Simon July 8, 2004 at 8:39 pm

We need to return to first principles. The reason we became physicians was to care for people, not patients! By that I mean, caring for the patient, rather than the disease.

Though I agree with your point, I think we also need a system of medicine that knows that sees the patient as a whole. After all, it’s the patient who is sick and not his blood chemistry. The blood chemistry is merely a symptom and treating the blood chemistry instead of the patient is a category mistake. The idea that the disease is one thing and the patient another is a pernicious idea that leads to the sort of dehumanization you criticize.

m July 8, 2004 at 9:33 pm

amen to above.

it’s easy to forget that the “system” of managed care is funding a for profit GIANT that greases many wheels belonging to CEOs, midldle management administrators, television ad executives, billing experts, legal armies, paper pushers, cutomer service reps. etc… . The patient is a necessary patsy, the physician is no more than a “provider”.

time to walk the path of integrity , time to acknowledge the profession is not dependent on third party payors. Our professional survival is only dependent on the people who we try to help.

hope July 10, 2004 at 3:38 pm

You say “Patients will be willing to pay a reasonable amount to get personalized health care.”

Only those patients who can afford it. You can rant all day about insurance companies and how awful they are, but in the end, it all comes down to what people are able and willing to pay.

Many Americans can barely afford the insurance they’ve currently got, and many can’t afford it it all. Sorry, but the notion that a personalized relationship with one’s doctor is something most people prioritize is just inaccurate. We might say we do, but priorities are reflected in where we are willing to put our resources. I don’t know of many families that would place a more personalized relationship with their doctor over meeting the mortgage, saving for college, putting food on the table or even taking an occasional family vacation.

m July 15, 2004 at 6:52 pm

the above comment is a good argument for health savings accounts. far better for the consumer to spend money as they wish on health care. for the young or healthy folks..why pay hundreds of dollars/month for health care insurance that thery likely don’t feel they need. this mandatory payout creates the multimilliion dollars salaries CEO administrators of the plans)
once people age or find themselves needy of health care then they can use the tax free money in the health savings acount as they see fit. many doctors (at least in primary care) could charge drastically less fees if they went on a cash basis. in this situation both the patient and provider win.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: