Now that the pharmaceutical companies have an OTC statin in Great Britain, we focus on the US market. Apparently, several companies have interest in OTC statins here. Drug Makers Propose OTC Cholesterol Drugs
Some of the world’s biggest drug companies are working behind the scenes to convince regulators to let older cholesterol-lowering drugs be sold without a prescription in low doses, as Britain has just done.
A decision is months away, but approval by the Food and Drug Administration could significantly affect the nation’s biggest public health problem, heart disease, and greatly expand sales in the top-selling drug category.
Cholesterol drugs, or statins, raked in $26 billion worldwide – $14 billion in this country alone – last year, according to health data company IMS Health. By limiting buildup of artery-clogging fat deposits, they can reduce risk of heart attack by about one-third. The category is dominated by blockbusters Lipitor, made by Pfizer Inc., and Zocor, made by Merck & Co. of Whitehouse Station.
While doctors say the drugs are safe, less than one-half of Americans who could benefit take them, mostly those at highest risk of heart disease, other complications and death, experts say. Most of the 18 million at moderate risk, defined as having a 10 percent to 20 percent risk of such problems over the next decade, are not on medication.
I continue to consider this issue. For those who pay out of pocket, we would see a price advantage (see the next quote). The problem that I have difficulty with remains inappropriate use. Statins are not a substitute for broad risk reduction. Statins are not an after steak guilt reduction agent.
Besides compiling evidence of Mevacor’s safety and effectiveness, the venture has worked with nearly 10,000 consumers through surveys, focus groups and tests in mock pharmacies. It’s all aimed at proving to FDA that the average Joe could correctly follow the proposed package information to determine whether he is a good candidate for the nonprescription version or needs a much stronger prescription dose.“Visits with a doctor are not required but are highly encouraged,” under the application being prepared for FDA, Hemwall said.
The company would encourage people to get follow-up tests of cholesterol levels. Hemwall said it will ask FDA not to require tests of liver function, because early concerns have proven since unwarranted.
Merck says nonprescription Mevacor likely will cost about $1 for each daily 20-milligram pill – more than what many insurance companies would charge for a co-payment on a brand-name prescription drug. Prescription Mevacor currently costs $2.10 per pill.
Launched in 1987, it had peak sales of $1.3 billion in 1994. That dropped to $31 million last year amid competition from generics and heavily advertised Lipitor.
It really is about the money. Insurance companies will support the concept, as it will decrease their costs. Many will support the concept on the basis of freedom.
I have not really decided yet. For many OTC would make sense. I hope we let Great Britain have at least a year lead time, so that we can learn from their experience.
So what do you think?
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
4 Responses to More on OTC statins
Lawrence Markman, M.D.
May 14th, 2004 at 7:11 am
We should take a hint from what is happening with OTC proton pump inhibitors. Almost all users of Prilosec OTC are taking it casually for symptom relief. Very few people take it on an empty stomach on a regular daily basis. Therefore, most users of the OTC product are probably not getting any benefit from it and are wasting their money. The same thing will happen when statins go OTC and may be purchased and used without physician guidance and follow-up.
Kathleen Weaver
May 14th, 2004 at 8:02 am
As a patient, the OTC allergy and GERD medications have cost me headaches and probably some money.
I have to jump through major hoops, as does my doctor to get me an nonOTC allergy med and a nonOTC GERD medication. Not only are those two medications ineffective for me, but one affects my blood pressure adversely. Also, you can never find Claritin without the D.
Plus, with my prescription plan, buying prescription rather than OTC is more cost effective.
Another drawback to the OTC meds, and one reason why patients don’t take it as they should, is that they are sold in 10 packs in the stores. What else is the patient going to think?
Yes, you can buy 30 pack, but I haven’t seen them readily available in the stores.
Daniel Newby
May 14th, 2004 at 4:55 pm
Kathleen Weaver says “I have to jump through major hoops, as does my doctor to get me an nonOTC allergy med and a nonOTC GERD medication. Not only are those two medications ineffective for me…”
The PPIs, like Prilosec, are usually safe in higher doses (but don’t trust me–ask your doctor). Some people take hundreds of milligrams of them a day. Something to keep in mind if the prescription stuff runs out.
“Also, you can never find Claritin without the D.”
It may be a local thing, but I’ve had no problem finding plain loratadine (generic for Claritin).
I recently noticed that “Claritin Hives Relief” is now being sold. It’s plain loratadine but in a fancy box with “Hives” in big letters. Ain’t marketing grand.
“Yes, you can buy 30 pack, but I haven’t seen them readily available in the stores.”
Again, it may be a local thing, but I’ve had no problem finding the 42-pack Prilosec and 30-pack loratadine.
John Anderson
May 17th, 2004 at 8:56 pm
New hope for cholesterol/fat?
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=KIBCCNTVLXBUMCRBAE0CFEY?type=scienceNews&storyID=5082664 Study: Molecule ‘Vacuums Up’ Fat from Mice