I love General Internal Medicine – both outpatient and inpatient. The intellectual and patient interaction challenges never diminish.
We must maintain broad knowledge and develop the skills to apply that knowledge to our patients. Unfortunately, most physicians can improve their performance.
However, I am often frustrated by the repeated complaints about generalist performance. Here are the two most recent examples:
CDC: Fewer doctors urge weight loss and Statins Underused in High-Risk Elderly Patients
These two examples represent an entire class of such articles. What do these articles tell us? How should we interpret the articles? What should we (the medical community) do with this information?
Using the medical paradigm, one should seek more than making a diagnosis. One should consider the possibilities of treatment. Moreover, we should not stop at making a diagnosis. We must understand what causes the problem.
Consider outpatient medical practice. Each day we see multiple patients with multiple medical problems. Each patient requires attention to a variety of medical problems, including the interaction of those problems. In addition to those problems, we must consider a variety of preventive measures. Careful consideration of all issues might take as long as 30-40 minutes for some patients. But our current reimbursement system dictates shorter visits. Our current reimbursement system dictates seeing too many patients.
Any interest group (and yes the CDC report on obesity represents an interest group) can seek and find deficiencies. However, I do not see much work on helping diagnose and treat the problem. We focus on symptoms, but do not understand the disease.
Thus, I decry these articles. They are no longer constructive, rather they are destructive.
We need a new attitude amongst the health services research community. Quit looking for deficiencies, rather focus on diagnosing and improving health care provision. We need constructive approaches to outpatient and inpatient care. We need to improve.
If I am slicing my drives, I go to my golf pro to diagnose why, and then work on techniques to improve my drives. If the pro just tells my that I have a lousy swing, but does not teach me how to improve, I would likely look for another pro (I say likely, because some golfers are not willing to really try to improve).
Our research group has a committment to understanding medical practice and the barriers to meeting guidelines. We hope to find solutions. I believe that rather than moan about errors and deficiencies, we should champion successes. We can learn more from the positives than the negatives. Physicians will strive towards excellence. Show us how!
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen


{ 5 comments }
this topic links directly with the
can primary care survive? rant.
you exactly describe the problem with the practice of general medicine. Under the current “climate” of manage care, primary care providers have a few minutes to listen, examine, consider, and treat a patient.
I would not trust an electrician or mechanic to work on my home or car if he/she was forced to do a rush job.
physicians by training offer a wealth of information and value. Each can translate that information to patients according to her/his own style and pace. Too many physician’s are cornered by circumstance into practicing in a way that makes sense for managed care and not for themselves professionally.
Chenry is right… we work much too hard on managed care issues AND caring for the patient. We should not allow the business of managed care to become our business.
Is dropping managed care possible? Yes, if you structure your practice in a way that allows independence from managed care.
examples
1. http://www.simplecare.com
2. http://www.aafp.org/fpm/20020300/25goin.html
3. NRMP website…data shows that med
avoid the hassles of primary/ general
medical practice by avoiding primary
care. (novel idea)
Some might say that practicing in the above styles restricts access to care,but given the loss of several thousand MD’s and DO’s training in primary or general medicine since 1997 the loss of access is already here.
Med students will choose primary care if they can see examples of doc’s practicing in styles that create satisfaction among patients and physicians. as a result more students will choose primary care and the access problems should lessen.
reform of general/primary care practice is occurring …not by relishing the good old days, pleading for fixes from legislative bodies, or begging profit motivated MCO’s to reimburse more.
Reform is occurring because their are thousands less physcians doing primary care
and those that remain are now acutely aware that we can do well without being dependent on MCO’s.
Don’t forget who is behind all of these cuts that we are seeing…lawyers who are supporting judges who are supporting lawyers. They exist to perpetuate their own kind. If lawyers had to submit charges on the equivalent of a HCFA form, wait 45 days, and then settle for around 50% of what they originally charged, then you’d see some changes take place in a hurry. Are we the only discipline that allows this to happen? I don’t recall going to Wal Mart and asking them to take 60% off of my total purchase.
Even if we had all day to see one patient, it would be impractical to address each and every issue that must be addressed in one visit. At some point, it just becomes too much information for the patient to handle.
If someone comes in to see me because they’re miserable from diarrhea, or because they want their blood pressure medicine refilled, or they want their pap smear, they have an idea in their mind why they’re there and what they want. They begin to lose interest when the conversation turns away from their agenda to mine.
The reality of dealing with people is much different than the ideal. And unfortunately, those in academia who perform these sorts of studies have no experience with reality.
Well said db.
From the specialists who devote 100% of their time to their pet disease, and from those folks who actually have the disease in question, there is this steady drumbeat of journal articles and news comments about how those awful terrible ignorant generalists don’t know about my pet disease. Look at the recent pain thread.
Force them to learn about it. States start passing legislation requiring certain specific CME’s in this disease or that disease. With the usual finesse of the politico’s, the legislation ends up requiring all doctors to get “X” number of CME points on the legislator’s pet disease, or to get a disgruntled fanatic constituent off his back.
So now the pediatrician can do CME’s on elder abuse instead of pediatric disease, or the pathologist can do CME’s on pain management when his patients are, shall we say, beyond pain when they come in the door. Heaven forbid the pathologists get CME’s on, say, reading PAP smears.
But far beyond that, of course, is the generalists. They are the nexus of all that is wrong in medicine today. They accuse the generalists of just about everything short of causing the disease.
After a while, you just get sick and tired of it. And you wonder why medical students are turning away from general medicine. I don’t blame them.
Soon general medicine will be the province of nurse practitioners.
That will solve the problem.
nurse practitioners?
I saw a manpower study dated 2001, it is expected that 50,000 NP’s will be out practicing by 2005. of course many are going into subspecialty care, but it would be probably a good guess to estimate 10,000 NP’s will be doing primary care by 2005.
Comments on this entry are closed.
{ 8 trackbacks }