This list represents my arbitrary ranking of the top ten stories covered which I covered this year. Factors which I used to develop the ranking concern the health of patients and the medical community. Limiting and ranking the list proved much more difficult than I first thought. Readers will disagree with my list, and I invite you to submit your own. I ranked stories higher that I thought had “legs”, i.e., we would continue to rant about this story in 2004.
Honorable mention
Increasing HIV in young gay males in the US – this story should scare all
The pharmaceutical industry – it was very difficult to leave this issue of the list, however, many stories on the list relate to the pharmaceutical industry
The COMET trial – very important, but also fairly specialized information
Quality assessment – I had some interesting rants on this issue and it may emerge as even more important over the next few years
Alternate payment structures for outpatient practice – these include a return to fee for service with no insurance billings and retainer medicine
And now for my list:
10. The influenza epidemic - this story shows the challenge of prevention. The CDC had to guess on the strains to include in the influenza vaccine. They guessed wrong, but seemingly made the best guess possible given the data they had.
9. SARS – this story reminds us once again how vulnerable we are to infectious diseases. We are unlikely to consistently defeat infections. The potential infecting agents are too numerous, and therefore we become susceptible to mutations that naturally occur – some of which are deadly.
8. ALLHAT – I ranted extensively on this subject. This study asked a the wrong question. The principle investigators overhyped the results. The study certainly reminds us to include a diuretic as the first or second line drug. It also reminds us that the most important variable is hypertensive control. Finally, it demonstrates that we should not take results at face value.
7. Preventing type II diabetes mellitus - this should rapidly become a major focus for preventive health. We have three major avenues – weight loss, exercise and medications. Future studies will help us learn how to approach “prediabetics” and how aggressively to screen for “prediabetes”. This story gain improtance due to the epidemic numbers of affected patients.
6. Obesity – this is a curse of Western civilization. We must develop positive programs to decrease obesity. Obesity puts patients at great risk for many problems, including type II diabetes mellitus. This story will not shrink anytime soon.
5. Medical marijuana – one could argue that I ranked this story too high. However, I believe that the intrusion of government into palliation represents a serious dilemma. The story about pain control that I ranted about yesterday represents the corollary issue. We must be able to better study and understand the benefits of marijuana in patients. Many citizens agree, and have voted in favor of these laws.
4. Dietary supplements – we have an illogical law pertaining to supplements. The ephedra fiasco represents the tip of the iceberg. Too many patients take too many supplements without any understanding of how they may effect their bodies, interact with pharmaceuticals, and even interact with each other.
3. The Medicare Bill – we are just starting to understand this bill, its strengths and weaknesses. Regardless of ones opinion, we all recognize this bill as a sea change. Future Congresses will likely modify features of the bill. I expect to rant often in 2004 on the bill’s effects
2. Medical Malpractice – we need true tort reform. We need a totally different system for insuring high quality care. We need a system which does not resemble a lottery. We need a system that protects patients and physicians alike. Our current system is broke – therefore we must fix it.
1. The time pressures on outpatient generalist practice – this is my number one story because I consider myself an advocate for generalist physicians. We ask our generalists to do more each year, and then structure a reimbursement system that pays them a fixed amount for a visit – regardless of the time necessary. It takes time to follow guidelines for prevention. It takes time to explain disease and management to patients. We must fix this problem to provide better quality care.
Many non-physicians think we can fix this with midlevel providers. To that I say “balderdash”! As we learn better how to care for patients the complexities of patient care increase exponentially. It does take a physician to do it right – and a physician with enough time. Not solving this problem will continue to have a major impact on overall patient care. This is our true health care crisis.
================================
Thank you for reading my blog. The readers continually stimulate me. I hope that I give you food for thought. I hope that medical blogging will eventually provide the grassroots for improving the medical care system. But then I am eternally optimistic.
Happy New Year’s to all. May the coming year bring you health and happiness.
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
3 Responses to db’s top ten medical stories of 2003
Anonymous
December 31st, 2003 at 2:02 pm
Which clearly illustrates the “study it to pieces before doing anything” approach of the federal medical authorities. Meanwhile, back in the real world, the situation literally evolves rapidly, and no battle plan survives contact with the enemy.
They did the same thing to the smallpox vaccine: killed the program because a couple of people had unusual reactions. Meanwhile, back in the real world, Soviet germ warfare people are still scattering to the four winds, and the price of gene synthesizers is still dropping on an exponential curve.
Which I see as another manifestation of the same problem. The FDA is so insistent on absolute control and massive studies, that the only way to allow supplements was to make them out-of-bounds for the FDA. If the tight-assed bureaucrats had done something sane with ephedra—like requiring pure, standardized doses, limiting the maximum dose per pill, and making the pills obnoxiously large—most of the damage would have been confined to reckless idiots. But that sort of practical risk analysis is anathema to the FDA. They decide what risk averseness is appropriate for you, and if you disagree you’re just SOL.
The flip side is that when the FDA doesn’t want to see something, no force in heaven or earth can make them. Trans fatty acids have arguably hurt Americans more than, well, nearly anything else, and the FDA has willfully ignored them. Even with all the nails driven into the coffin by massive studies, they still have done nothing yet. Ditto for nicotine, which could be made fairly harmless (as these things go) by simply restricting the use of smoke in the delivery formulation.
OnlyOnePot
January 1st, 2004 at 4:23 pm
Hi Medrants,
Your salary won’t be increasing with the ridiculous cost of drugs. The notion that extremely expensive ACE-I are either no better or potentially less effective than thiazide diuretics represents a huge waste of ((LIMITED)) health care dollars. Please choose one of the following:
1) Stick with your current salary and prescribe whichever antihypertensive you like.
2) Prescribe thiazides first line and advocate some of the money previously wasted on ACE-Is goes to help providing comprehensive outpatient care.
1 or 2 ?
Bernie Simon
January 1st, 2004 at 7:56 pm
We have an illogical law pertaining to supplements. The ephedra fiasco represents the tip of the iceberg.
All laws reflect political compromise. There’s no “logical” way to regulate supplements because they inhabit a gray area between foods and medicines. Presumably the government’s interest in the area begins and ends with risk to the public. As an exercise to the reader, compare the number people die each year as a result of over the counter NSAIDS with those who have died from ephedra. Then contrast the media attention that has been given to both.
Ephedra is a useful medicine that’s been given a black eye from a foolish misuse of the product. The public thought it was a safe and easy way to lose weight. The public has learned better and abandoned it — prior to any FDA action. I am at least gratified the the FDA will allow TCM practitioners to continue to use it.