Worried Pain Doctors Decry Prosecutions
In recent years, similar charges of illegally prescribing prescription narcotics, criminal conspiracy, racketeering and even murder have been brought in dozens of states against scores of doctors who treat chronic pain with prescription narcotics. At least two have been imprisoned, one committed suicide, several are awaiting sentencing, many are preparing for trial, and more have lost their licenses to practice medicine and accumulated huge legal bills.
Top DEA officials say only a relative handful of doctors have gotten into trouble with the law and that all were prescribing drugs outside medical norms in a manner that amounted to trafficking. The prosecutions, they say, have had a positive effect.
“There have been a number of very high-profile cases, and they have been a learning lesson to other physicians,” said Elizabeth Willis, chief of drug operations for the DEA Office of Diversion Control. “We think doctors are much more aware of appropriate guidelines for prescribing OxyContin now.”
But increasingly worried pain specialists say that although some doctors may be running narcotic “pill mills” and even selling prescriptions for narcotics, many others who have been arrested appear to be responsible physicians.
Their crime, it seems, is that they were supplying their chronic pain patients with sometimes large numbers of prescriptions for controlled but legal medications to treat their pain. The result, the doctors say, is that the established medical use of opium-based drugs for pain is becoming criminalized by aggressive drug agents and zealous prosecutors.
On the one hand we (physicians) are urged to attend to pain. To not address a patient’s pain issue leaves us open to intense criticism. This guideline addresses the issue – MODEL GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAIN
Inadequate pain control may result from physicians’ lack of knowledge about pain management or an inadequate understanding of addiction. Fears of investigation or sanction by federal, state, and local regulatory agencies may also result in inappropriate or inadequate treatment of chronic pain patients. Accordingly, these guidelines have been developed to clarify the Board’s position on pain control, specifically as related to the use of controlled substances, to alleviate physician uncertainty and to encourage better pain management.
The Board recognizes that controlled substances, including opioid analgesics, may be essential in the treatment of acute pain due to trauma or surgery and chronic pain, whether due to cancer or non-cancer origins. Physicians are referred to the U.S. Agency for Health Care and Research Clinical Practice Guidelines for a sound approach to the management of acute1 and cancer-related pain.
The medical management of pain should be based upon current knowledge and research and includes the use of both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic modalities. Pain should be assessed and treated promptly and the quantity and frequency of doses should be adjusted according to the intensity and duration of the pain. Physicians should recognize that tolerance and physical dependence are normal consequences of sustained use of opioid analgesics and are not synonymous with addiction.
We have adopted pain as the 5th vital sign. This VA document discusses the importance of attending to pain – Pain as the 5th Vital Sign: Take 5.
Pain control challenges us daily. We have no great objective quantification of pain. Patients can fool us. Thus we are damned if we ignore and damned if we treat too aggressively.
This story is scary. We need a better method for controlling physicians who overprescribe pain medications. DEA arrests are not the answer. Back to our article –
“Fifteen years of progress in treating patients in chronic pain could really be wiped away if these prosecutions continue,” said Russell K. Portenoy, a pain specialist at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York who is considered one of the fathers of modern pain management. Since the mid-1980s, Portenoy has been advocating the use of morphine-based drugs to address what he considers to be the widespread, unnecessary and even cruel undertreatment of chronic pain.
“Treating people in pain isn’t easy, and there aren’t black-and-white answers,” he said, agreeing that some doctors have not been sufficiently careful about potential problems with addiction and diversion of drugs. “But what’s happening now is that the medical ambiguity is being turned into allegations of criminal behavior. We have to draw a line in the sand here, or else the treatment will be lost, and millions of patients will suffer.”
Amen!
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
9 Responses to Damned if you do, damned if you don’t (or how to get caught between a rock and a hard place)
Matthew Holt
December 30th, 2003 at 2:58 pm
This may be new to some readers but don’t forget that the DEA is run by the justice department run by Ashcroft. Despite the fact that his nephew was let off drug- dealing charges that get others jailed for 10+ years and he himself broke the law in Missouri by helping the police effectively steal confiscated drug money from the school system, he is a total offensive bigot on the drug issue. The attack on pain doctors is well known amongst the drug reform community and is similar to the massively over-proportional attack by the hypocritical and frankly fascistic Christian right and their appointed representatives on people who disagree with their notions of drug use and abuse. And if you think the DEA gives a rat’s arse about patients or doctors you are very much mistaken. Obviously the pain medication issue needs to be taken out of the criminal arena into the health arena, but there is no prospect of that with the Republicans in power.
storkdoc
December 30th, 2003 at 8:57 pm
Well it seems for Mr Holt that all of our medical problems are the fault of the Bush Administration. If only it were so simple…..
John Schedler
December 30th, 2003 at 9:18 pm
I make the bulk of my living representing Drs before the DEA & disciplinary authorities (WA State). Mr. Holt should know that the Reno Justice dept was much worse on this issue.
I can win these cases — I usually do. But they cost a fortune & insurance is usually of little or no help,
Craig
December 31st, 2003 at 11:44 am
5th vital sign my butt. This is absolutely one of my pet peeves. I’m not saying we shouldn’t assess pain and treat pain, but it isnot a vital sign. For one thing, vital signs are objective, pain scales are not. For another, vital signs measure vital information. Significant abnormalities in any of the four real vital signs is always clinically significant, usually urgent. A reported 10/10 on a pain scale is sometimes significant, but basically never life-threatening in isolation. Any patient with life threatening pain will have other history and physical information to guide a doctor.
Elevating pain to the level of a vital sign has hastened the ridiculous pressure on physicians to treat all pain. Absolute freedom from pain is not a necessity of life. Even as I type this, I have a moderate pain in the left side of my neck which I woke up with (you know, a crick in my neck). I’m not comparing this to the pain of many patients with other conditions such as terminal cancer or severe rheumatoid arthritis, but I do think it compares to many of the patients I see in the Fast Track complaining of 10/10 back pain who are allergic to Toradol and all muscle relaxers except Soma and know that only a narcotic pain shot will work. I see far more of these patients than I do patients with a legitimate need for narcotic pain medications.
Finally, anyone who says that there aren’t major problems with physician overprescribing is either part of the problem, has their head in the sand, or is a complete idiot. I know of several docs who prescribe a buttload of narcotics to a ton of patients. Every other doc who’s being honest with you does too.
Look, I don’t mind seeing an elderly patient with rheumatoid arthritis or a dying cancer patient who’s become addicted to narcotics. Who cares? Pain control is important. But what is much more common is the 38 year old unemployed and apparently healthy young person whose been taking 100 hydrocodone tablets and 100 Soma tablets (as prescribed) a month and says they have to have them to deal with chronic back pain, which has been evaluated and is not surgical. Look, it’s a hard answer, but the truth is there is nowhere good to go from there. Being a drug addict in your 30’s does not predict a long health contributory life. Pain sucks, but as my grandmama used to say, “Nobody ever said it was going to be easy.”
It is not medically necessary to treat all pain to complete resolution. Somebody has to say it, so I will.
kill as few patients as possible
December 31st, 2003 at 11:50 am
DB’s Medical Rants: Damned if you do, damned if you don’t (or how to get caught between a rock and a hard place)
DB recently posted some excerpts from an article about doctors going to jail for overprescribing narcotics. He maks some good points, and I agree the handling this problem criminally is dumb, but I wanted to take a moment to comment
Mark
January 1st, 2004 at 7:52 pm
Craig,
I could not agree with you more. I have patients sitting my office looking quite comfortable,having normal measurable vitals who states that they have pain that is 10/10.
I’ll then ask them “So, if I cut off your arm with a chain saw and no pain meds this pain that your having now is about the same?”
Most patients will usually revise their scale down at this point, but I have had several who agreed.
I HATE the so called 5th vital sign.
Insults Unpunished
January 1st, 2004 at 8:13 pm
Another Abuse Of The War On Drugs™
Worried Pain Doctors Decry Prosecutions (washingtonpost.com) I spotted this article over at db’s place earlier this week and had been meaning to comment on it. Of course, his comments are more well-informed since he’s a doctor, but I’ll focus on…
Matthew Holt
January 5th, 2004 at 7:06 pm
Storkdoc has a somewhat over agressive interpretation of my opinion being that the Bush adminstration is the cause of all medicine’s troubles….
However, whether pain is a big deal or not, no rational person can give a good reason for the criminalization of what is a health problem — be it pain or addiction to narcotics. Unles of course they are on a religious crusade or making money out of it or both (as in Ashcroft’s case)
davelo
January 5th, 2004 at 9:08 pm
Well it seems for Mr Holt that all of our medical problems are the fault of the Bush Administration. If only it were so simple…..