<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The National Review on Arnold and marijuana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medrants.com/archives/1450/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/1450</link>
	<description>Contemplating medicine and the health care system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.medrants.com/archives/1450/comment-page-1#comment-2386</link>
		<dc:creator>John Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medrants.com/archives/2003/09/10/the-national-review-on-arnold-and-marijuana/#comment-2386</guid>
		<description>Changing the law, which was passed some time back and classes marijuana as &quot;of no medical value&quot; despite later developments such as marinol, might be very difficult politically, even to reclass it as a prescription drug. There would be a lot of messy fighting about how far to go, other drugs, etc. And then there is the &quot;scientific&quot; objection that dosage could not be pre-determined. 
 
But there may be a simpler way: if the FDA would cooperate, it could &quot;legalize&quot; prescriptions by calling government programs &quot;research&quot;. Politicians whose constituents oppose any loosening could claim they object but cannot overrule the FDA, while those whose constituencies approve could say they support the FDA&#039;s research of what might be an important addition to the pharmacoepia. 
 
For what good it might do, I have mailed this as a suggestion to my federal reps. 
 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changing the law, which was passed some time back and classes marijuana as &#8220;of no medical value&#8221; despite later developments such as marinol, might be very difficult politically, even to reclass it as a prescription drug. There would be a lot of messy fighting about how far to go, other drugs, etc. And then there is the &#8220;scientific&#8221; objection that dosage could not be pre-determined. </p>
<p>But there may be a simpler way: if the FDA would cooperate, it could &#8220;legalize&#8221; prescriptions by calling government programs &#8220;research&#8221;. Politicians whose constituents oppose any loosening could claim they object but cannot overrule the FDA, while those whose constituencies approve could say they support the FDA&#8217;s research of what might be an important addition to the pharmacoepia. </p>
<p>For what good it might do, I have mailed this as a suggestion to my federal reps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
