ALLHAT overhyped – as I said originally

3

Category : Medical Rants

Scientists should avoid political agendas. I fear that the principal investigators of the ALLHAT study wanted to advance an agenda with their initial press conferences about the results. Apparently I am not alone. Two ALLHAT Investigators Say Results Misinterpreted and Misused

“Diuretics probably are not the preferred antihypertensive therapy in most North American patients,” said Dr. Houston, who, along with Dr. Weber, was one of the many investigators in the NHLBI-sponsored Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. The study compared cardiovascular outcomes among 42,418 patients age 55 and older who had at least one heart disease risk factor.
In an undated statement given to reporters Wednesday, NHLBI director Claude Lenfant acknowledged the on-going controversy. The NHLBI “recognizes that ALLHAT’s data can be variously interpreted, and the Institute is looking into other conclusions,” he said in the statement, adding that the NHLBI-sponsored hypertension treatment guidelines are in the midst of revision.

Drs. Houston and Weber charge that the ALLHAT study results will be used as the rationale in those guidelines for putting an even greater emphasis on using diuretics as a first-line treatment. The guidelines, formulated by the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, will be issued at the American Society for Hypertension meeting in May.

Even though a majority of physicians don’t follow the JNC guidelines, the group’s backing will add to the perception that diuretics are best, said Dr. Houston.

Dr. Houston said that ALLHAT’s design was flawed, leading to muddied results, particularly for African Americans. Overall, he said, when the study is adjusted to reflect the underdosing in people randomized to the ACE inhibitor lisinopril, all the drugs studied show an equal reduction in heart attack, with perhaps a slight edge for lisinopril.

He argued against emphasizing diuretics as a first-line therapy, claiming that the drugs might be nephrotoxic, and cause more diabetes. Plus, said Dr. Houston, there’s a huge body of evidence that contradicts the ALLHAT findings.

Dr. Weber agreed that chlorthalidone was no more effective in reducing myocardial infarction, and he said it had not done a better job at reducing mortality.

“Diuretics are a necessary treatment in many patients,” said Dr. Weber, who told Reuters Health that 70% of his patients are on a diuretic, but as part of a multidrug regimen. “They should not be the foundation for antihypertensive therapy,” he said.

It is nice to see that reason is starting to prevail here.

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen

Comments (3)

I’m pleased that someone has the guts to bring some common sense into this debate. The NYT and other media outlets spun the results simplistically as a triumph of science over corporate greed with their “cheaper is better” mantra. Consequently it’s been virtually impossible to challenge the results without being labeled as a drug company shill. The fact is the study design stacked the deck heavilly against lisinopril not only by inappropriate initial monotherapy in African Americans, but also due to irrational chioces of step 2 and 3 drugs (clonidine, hydralazine and reserpine). This is contrary to what was already known about the optimal use of ACE inhibitors, and certainly not the way the drugs are used in the community. Assuming that the investigators knew this, I too wonder if they had an agenda.

Well I found the original ALLHAT results inherently plausible partly because the lower stroke rate fit in with discussions in earlier articles such as:

Antihypertensive drug therapies and the risk of ischemic stroke.
Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jan 8;161(1):37-43.
PMID: 11146696 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE] by Klungel OH, Heckbert SR, Longstreth WT Jr, Furberg CD, Kaplan RC, Smith NL, Lemaitre RN, Leufkens HG, de Boer A, Psaty BM.

which I found quite persuasive when published. I see the bounceback not as common sense reasserting itself but as denial and pharma bouncing back. Thiazide diuretics are best first choice for hypertension for most IMO.

Lest Anne suspect that my sentiments are influenced by Pharma, perhaps I should provide my conflict of interest disclosure.

1) A have no financial interest or other ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
2) I dislike the politicization of issues of science.

I think Anne has given some credence to the point I made in the third sentence of my original post.

Robert W. Donnell