Previous Entry | Main | Next Entry

September 06, 2002


The IOM on exercise and diet

Panel Urges Hour of Exercise a Day.

Americans need to exercise more — at least an hour a day, twice as much as previously recommended — to maintain their health and a normal body weight, according to new guidelines issued yesterday by the Institute of Medicine, the medical division of the National Academies.

In a thousand-page report, a team of 21 experts suggested for the first time a range of recommended amounts for what are called macronutrients — proteins, fats and carbohydrates — and also included advice on how much dietary fiber and exercise people should strive for to maintain good health. Previous reports over the last 60 years have dealt only with recommended levels of vitamins and minerals.

The panel's recommendations give wide leeway in choosing an acceptable diet. The report said that to meet daily needs for energy and nutrients while minimizing the risk of developing chronic ills like heart disease and diabetes, adults should get 45 percent to 65 percent of their daily calories from carbohydrates. It recommended a maximum of 25 percent of calories from added sugars, 20 percent to 35 percent of calories from fats, and 10 percent to 35 percent of calories from protein. In addition, the panel recommended that adult men 50 and under consume 38 grams of fiber a day and adult women 21 grams a day.

The new guidelines, called the Dietary Reference Intakes, are intended for use by professional nutritionists in private practice, hospitals and schools, as well as by individuals.

Do these recommendations sound difficult on exercise and loose on sugars? They do to me, and apparently they do to this expert.

Dr. Marion Nestle, chairwoman of the department of nutrition and food studies at New York University, called the exercise recommendation "amazing but impractical," given that 60 percent of the population is now totally sedentary.

"I hardly know anyone — and I know a lot of health-conscious people — who exercises an hour a day," Dr. Nestle said. "This creates a lot of tension between what's ideal and what's possible. We know half an hour a day confers substantial benefits. Wouldn't it have been better to say some exercise is better than none, and more is better than some?"

Dr. Nestle said she was also concerned about the panel's recommendation that as much as 25 percent of calories could come from added sugars, the caloric sweeteners added to manufactured foods and beverages like soda, candy, fruit drinks, cakes, cookies, ice cream and other sweets. The 25 percent limit would allow a person who consumes 2,000 calories a day to drink three and a third 12-ounce sodas each day, if soda was that person's only source of added sugars.

"This is a huge amount of added sugars in a country where soft drinks, a major source of sugars in the American diet, are increasingly a factor in the rise in overweight," Dr. Nestle said, adding that most earlier recommendations called for no more than 10 percent of calories from added sugars."

For those interested, the press release can be found here - Report Offers New Eating and Exercise Targets To Reduce Chronic Disease Risk and the entire report is available online - Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrates, Fiber, Fat, Protein and Amino Acids (Macronutrients) (2002).

Posted by on September 06, 2002 05:34 AM | TrackBack




Comments:


Can any one think of a better last name for the chair of nutrition than Nestle? It makes you think that she's trying awfully hard in life to overcome her moniker. Kind of like kids who hate their names because they got teased about it as children. (Dolores! for all you Seinfeld fans)

But I agree that this is too hard on exercise and too soft on sugar. If the problem with getting people to exercise 30 minutes a day was almost insurmountable, how impossible do you think it will be to convince people to find an hour a day to exercise?

It almost makes me think that the standards are being set up to fail (and then, of course, spend lots of money studying why they failed).

Posted by: Ross on September 6, 2002 11:20 AM



I don't see anything particularly wrong with this recommendation, nor do I think an hour of exercise a day is unusually difficult to come by. If you watch an hour of tv a day, put a treadmill or exercise bike in front of it. Personally, I'd much rather positive recommendations (do something) to negative ones (don't eat this, eat less of that). In any case, I think the emphasis is where it should be - on activity level. It is possible to be healthy (good blood pressure, resting heart rate, etc.) eating instinctively (i.e., what you think you're hungry for) and riding a bike 1 to 2 hrs a day. I don't think a carefully planned diet and 30 minutes of gentle walking is going to get you the same level of fitness/health.

Brian

Posted by: brian on September 6, 2002 08:05 PM



I have a difficult time getting patients to exercise 30 minutes, 3 times a week. An hour a day works for commuting, not for exercise. I would love to exercise one hour each day, but even an obsessed exerciser like myself finds this recommendation challenging. I do agree with you that positive recommendations make sense. It just will be a hard sell.

Posted by: db on September 6, 2002 08:31 PM



Oh goodie, another bunch weigh in with a diet only an active NFL player could approach with less than a pole-vault length spoon.

And all those sugars - not converted sugars, either, from eating bread: no, out-and-out refined sugar. After forty years of being told it's a no-no.

Hey, let's bring back the grapefruit diet! It's a type of fruit, right? And (with the partial exception of the early stages of Atkins), every diet says fruit is good, right? So it must be a great diet!

Posted by: John Anderson on September 6, 2002 09:55 PM






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?






It would be nice if everybody could find a doctor with half the common sense of this one. - Junkyardblog

An academic general internist comments on medical issues and the current state of medicine.

I reserve the right to be blatantly opinionated; you should take the right to criticize me!!



Try advanced site search!



The Sunday Issue of the Week continues. This feature will challenge me to carefully ponder an issue that I've referenced and commented on recently.

Current hot issues:

• Malpractice crisis
• Resident work hours
• Pharmaceutical industry
• Obesity and fitness